Anfield Expansion - Anfield Road End (Main Stand Completed)

bazza66

TIA Oldie, still in the Youth Team though
Ad-free Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2003
Messages
1,143
You hear the argument that "old Jim is now too old to stand for 90 mins in the Kop, but why should he move from the Kop - he's always been there". Whilst I agree that sentiment has a part to play, I'd also argue that back when there were terraces, Jim would have had no choice.

No idea who Jim is.
Jim's a twat
 

Danny_

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2013
Messages
1,898
The problem with safe standing is say a section was built into the Kop those people not in the safe standing will still stand as they do now. The idea that a 3000 or 5000 standing section in a 12000+ seat stand will mean the other 7000 will all sit down is pretty ludicrous to me. Yes it works at Celtic because they didnt have 12000 people in that stand standing up all game. Thats not the case at Anfield.
Dortmund and other German clubs have safe standing and it works for them.
 

Iluvatar

Allez (x6)
Ad-free Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2015
Messages
8,729
I reckon it will be the full Kop going standing, and then ARE being seated with an expansion. We'll then push towards 65k.
 

Mascot88

Yours for £1m. Need to make room for Dean Saunders
Admin
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
23,317
Safe Standing or rail seating is still going problematic for a club like Liverpool, because the circumstances around ticket sales and how supporters engage with the stadium have changed.

There used to be an informal graduation process at Anfield, and I’d imagine most of the big stadiums worked in a similar way. Kids would start off in the boys pen, and then when old enough move into the Kop. When the Kop got too much for the older lads they’d move over to one of the seated stands.

Nowadays there isn’t the option for someone who is finding it tough to stand up to simply move to another part of the ground. The clamour for tickets is too great and there is far less flex in the way tickets are sold to allow people and element of choice about where they sit/stand.

I remember the first time I went to Anfield, in the late eighties, me and my family, rocked up, paid cash on the turnstile, and went into the Kop.

I’m not against standing for safety reasons or anything like that, in fact I’m broadly in favour - but there needs to be a complete rethink of ticketing and waiting lists alongside it.
 

Anfield rd Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Ad-free Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
12,428
Safe Standing or rail seating is still going problematic for a club like Liverpool, because the circumstances around ticket sales and how supporters engage with the stadium have changed.

There used to be an informal graduation process at Anfield, and I’d imagine most of the big stadiums worked in a similar way. Kids would start off in the boys pen, and then when old enough move into the Kop. When the Kop got too much for the older lads they’d move over to one of the seated stands.

Nowadays there isn’t the option for someone who is finding it tough to stand up to simply move to another part of the ground. The clamour for tickets is too great and there is far less flex in the way tickets are sold to allow people and element of choice about where they sit/stand.

I remember the first time I went to Anfield, in the late eighties, me and my family, rocked up, paid cash on the turnstile, and went into the Kop.

I’m not against standing for safety reasons or anything like that, in fact I’m broadly in favour - but there needs to be a complete rethink of ticketing and waiting lists alongside it.
Regardless of that I think we are well overdue a restructure of the ticketing process.
 

dockers_strike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2017
Messages
740
Dortmund and other German clubs have safe standing and it works for them.
Indeed they do and thank god they havent had any accidents.

The simple point is this though; You introduce a 'safe standing' in a part of the ground. Then, the rest of the people in the stand and maybe other parts of the ground that dont have standing go 'they are standing up so I want to stand up' even though they arent in a 'safe standing' area. You only have to look at the Kop now. During many matches, Id say a good 60+% of people are standing. The whole Kop isnt going to be made 'safe standing' so it's pretty clear what's going to happen.
 

ILLOK

In the Danger Zone.
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
16,673
Indeed they do and thank god they havent had any accidents.

The simple point is this though; You introduce a 'safe standing' in a part of the ground. Then, the rest of the people in the stand and maybe other parts of the ground that dont have standing go 'they are standing up so I want to stand up' even though they arent in a 'safe standing' area. You only have to look at the Kop now. During many matches, Id say a good 60+% of people are standing. The whole Kop isnt going to be made 'safe standing' so it's pretty clear what's going to happen.
By your own logic, if 60% are already standing why aren't the other 40% standing?
 

ILLOK

In the Danger Zone.
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
16,673
Safe Standing or rail seating is still going problematic for a club like Liverpool, because the circumstances around ticket sales and how supporters engage with the stadium have changed.

There used to be an informal graduation process at Anfield, and I’d imagine most of the big stadiums worked in a similar way. Kids would start off in the boys pen, and then when old enough move into the Kop. When the Kop got too much for the older lads they’d move over to one of the seated stands.

Nowadays there isn’t the option for someone who is finding it tough to stand up to simply move to another part of the ground. The clamour for tickets is too great and there is far less flex in the way tickets are sold to allow people and element of choice about where they sit/stand.

I remember the first time I went to Anfield, in the late eighties, me and my family, rocked up, paid cash on the turnstile, and went into the Kop.

I’m not against standing for safety reasons or anything like that, in fact I’m broadly in favour - but there needs to be a complete rethink of ticketing and waiting lists alongside it.
Surely the rail seating would go to STHs first, and if so this concern really isn't an issue. If somebody doesn't want to stand they can apply to move and somebody else will take their place.
 

Iluvatar

Allez (x6)
Ad-free Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2015
Messages
8,729
Safe Standing or rail seating is still going problematic for a club like Liverpool, because the circumstances around ticket sales and how supporters engage with the stadium have changed.

There used to be an informal graduation process at Anfield, and I’d imagine most of the big stadiums worked in a similar way. Kids would start off in the boys pen, and then when old enough move into the Kop. When the Kop got too much for the older lads they’d move over to one of the seated stands.

Nowadays there isn’t the option for someone who is finding it tough to stand up to simply move to another part of the ground. The clamour for tickets is too great and there is far less flex in the way tickets are sold to allow people and element of choice about where they sit/stand.

I remember the first time I went to Anfield, in the late eighties, me and my family, rocked up, paid cash on the turnstile, and went into the Kop.

I’m not against standing for safety reasons or anything like that, in fact I’m broadly in favour - but there needs to be a complete rethink of ticketing and waiting lists alongside it.
I think that's part of the problem, but I don't think it's mainly down to the club. There are a few factors;

1st point is that there are far too many old arses still holding onto their Kop tickets, as you say there was always a natural migration to the quieter stands, but it has really slowed down to a point its hardly happening.
2nd point is that there is nowhere for people to go, yes there was an opportunity when the Main Stand expanded, so hopefully with an ARE expansion similar could happen.

One of the big blockages to atmosphere is the lack of like minded fans sitting together, I've been in the Kop in recent years and there are loads of oldies who just sit there and grumble all game.. Which is sad as I'd bet 20 years ago they were pissing down a newspaper and singing till horse. They need to move on, and the club needs to help with that process. Telling them it was going standing only would shift a good number!
 

dockers_strike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2017
Messages
740
By your own logic, if 60% are already standing why aren't the other 40% standing?
That's pretty easy to determine, isnt it? It's because the other 40% want to sit down, not everyone wants to stand! And those 40% probably do have to stand at many points during the game to see because the other 60% will not sit down at all. In any event, 60+% of the Kop equates to over 7200 fans standing, there's no way the club is making a 'safe standing' area to accommodate over 7000 fans.

I think people are missing a point about 'older' fans should move out of the Kop. The Kop is one of the cheapest, if not the cheapest seating in the whole ground. Not every arl arse has pots of money to afford the cost of the KD or Main Stand. Ergo, they keep their seat and their match going costs down.
 

dockers_strike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2017
Messages
740
So, tell me why they'd suddenly stand if safe standing was introduced elsewhere?
You've clearly not been to many games at Anfield if you think most people are not standing on the Kop.

OK, I suggested 60% of a 12000 capacity stand are currently standing. That equates to around 7000 people. So, you're trying to suggest that if the club introduces a 'safe standing' section for say 3000 (like Celtic) that 4000 other people (7000 less 3000) who also currently stand are suddenly going to sit because they arent in the 'safe standing' area? Behave.
 
C

Caradoc

Guest
There’s a big difference between standing when your side are on the attack or just scored and then sitting back down and standing up throughout the match.

If the regulations change then maybe the club should think about incorporating a safe standing area in the redeveloped Anfield Road end first and taking it from there. It would probably be better to introduce changes gradually because of the costs involved.

As for standing in seated areas, the SKD stand is an accident waiting to happen. The amount of foot room before you trip over the seat back in front of you is very small. I can’t remember if its as bad on The Kop. Still if some on here get there way The Kop will out of bounds for people of my age soon.

One thought - if there is a council limit on the capacity for Anfield, if the club push ahead with their existing plans for the Anfield Road end what (if anything) would be the effect of introducing safe standing areas on the stadium capacity? How would they decide on the capacity of a safe standing area compared with the equivalent seated only area? Would the permitted capacity be increased/decreased and if so by how much? At Anfield with the existing narrow standing room I guess capacity changes would be negligible compared with say stadia in Germany.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ILLOK

In the Danger Zone.
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
16,673
You've clearly not been to many games at Anfield if you think most people are not standing on the Kop.

OK, I suggested 60% of a 12000 capacity stand are currently standing. That equates to around 7000 people. So, you're trying to suggest that if the club introduces a 'safe standing' section for say 3000 (like Celtic) that 4000 other people (7000 less 3000) who also currently stand are suddenly going to sit because they arent in the 'safe standing' area? Behave.
I think you're confused pal, you seem to be attributing things to me that I've never said.

As for your argument...better to have 3,000 safe standing 'seats' and 4,000 standing in normal seats than 7,000 standing as is currently the case (according to your figures).
 

Gone Kloppo

Formerly known as Ʒan
Joined
Jul 15, 2016
Messages
2,443
One thought - if there is a council limit on the capacity for Anfield, if the club push ahead with their existing plans for the Anfield Road end what (if anything) would be the effect of introducing safe standing areas on the stadium capacity? How would they decide on the capacity of a safe standing area compared with the equivalent seated only area? Would the permitted capacity be increased/decreased and if so by how much? At Anfield with the existing narrow standing room I guess capacity changes would be negligible compared with say stadia in Germany.
Completely depends on the design but extremely unlikely that the capacity would increase. I think the capacity at Celtic Park was the same before and after installing rail seats. The government/FA would never sign off on safe standing like that in the Bundesliga.
 
Last edited:
C

Caradoc

Guest
Completely depends on the design but extremely unlikely that the capacity would increase. I think the capacity at Celtic Park was the same before and after installing rail seats, and I cant envisage the FA/Government straying too far from that design and heading down the Westfalenstadion 1.5/seat route.

There are structural, design and spatial issues before we even get to regulations. The 3 older Anfield stands have narrower/smaller space allocation per seat than Westfalenstadion and so are quite probably not suitable for that sort of ratio.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

dockers_strike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2017
Messages
740
I think you're confused pal, you seem to be attributing things to me that I've never said.

As for your argument...better to have 3,000 safe standing 'seats' and 4,000 standing in normal seats than 7,000 standing as is currently the case (according to your figures).
I think you're the confused one 'pal.' You seem intent twisting what I have written. Where's my argument it is better to have 3000 and 4000 standing in normal seats? I have written no such thing. Why do you lie to counter a reasoned argument? I used those figures as examples of 60+% standing and what potentially would happen if 7000 people currently standing had 3000 'safe standing' seats and what the other 4000 would probably do based on current circumstances.

For the record, Im against a 'safe standing' section at Anfield under any circumstances. Im saying people should sit. Obviously there are times when we all stand during an attacking or other decisive moment during a game. But carry on twisting what other people have posted 'pal.'
 

ILLOK

In the Danger Zone.
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
16,673
I think you're the confused one 'pal.' You seem intent twisting what I have written. Where's my argument it is better to have 3000 and 4000 standing in normal seats? I have written no such thing. Why do you lie to counter a reasoned argument? I used those figures as examples of 60+% standing and what potentially would happen if 7000 people currently standing had 3000 'safe standing seats and what the other 4000 would probably do based on current circumstances.

For the record, Im against a 'safe standing' section at Anfield under any circumstances. Im saying people should sit. Obviously there are times when we all stand during an attacking or other decisive moment during a game. But carry on twisting what other people have posted 'pal.'
No, you're still confused.

The bolded was my argument. I'll try again - if there are already 7000 standing, wouldn't it be better if 3000 of those were standing in designated standing areas?

Are you drunk? It's only 11 am, slow it down.
 

dockers_strike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2017
Messages
740
No, you're still confused.

The bolded was my argument.

Are you drunk? It's only 11 am, slow it down.
Yes, confused by your poorly phrased argument that actually suggested something else on reading. As for your drunk comment, pathetic. But it is usually what people do when shown to be lacking the ability to discuss things.
 

ILLOK

In the Danger Zone.
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
16,673
Yes, confused by your poorly phrased argument that actually suggested something else on
reading. As for your drunk comment, pathetic. But it is usually what people do when shown to be lacking the ability to discuss things.
You still haven't explained why it would be a big problem if the other 4000, who already stand up, would continue to stand up.
 

Kopstar

★★★★★★
Joined
Jun 15, 2007
Messages
14,437
No, you're still confused.

The bolded was my argument. I'll try again - if there are already 7000 standing, wouldn't it be better if 3000 of those were standing in designated standing areas?

Are you drunk? It's only 11 am, slow it down.
Tbf, kick off's in just over an hour and if you're going to stand for the game and risk injuring yourself by falling over the seats in front it helps to be a little tipsy.
 

dockers_strike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2017
Messages
740
Whole area behind the goal standing during the Celtic Rangers game, not just the specified 'safe standing area' which illustrates my point.
 

lfc.8

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2012
Messages
2,495
Could Anfield railway station solve Liverpool FC's planning problems?

MP says station near stadium would help solve congestion problems.

The problems surrounding Liverpool's future plans for Anfield could potentially be solved by a new train station in the area.

That is the view of the area's Member of Parliament Dan Carden, who was commenting after the shock decision of the city council's planning committee this week to block the Reds' hopes of hosting other major sporting events including boxing bouts and American Football matches at its famous ground.

Another decision on whether Anfield could play host to major music concerts was deferred - with the club told in no uncertain terms that it would have to offer far more to local residents for the plans to get the green light.

The planning committee was convinced by passionate accounts from people living close to Anfield on issues such as parking, noise and anti-social behaviour - as well as a stated poor level of consultation from the club - that the plans in their current format should not go ahead.

The club has been told to work with partners to come up with more solutions for local people - and Mr Carden believes a new train station in the area could solve a number of problems.

The idea of an Anfield station is mentioned in Merseytravel's latest Long-Term Rail Strategy , published last year.

And the idea of a station for Liverpol FC was floated in the 2000s when the club was still considering moving to a new Stanley Park stadium.

Mr Carden said: "Liverpool FC's plans for Anfield must involve the local community and recognise their concerns.

"Local residents suffer problems including parking, congestion and air quality, and want the club to take these issues seriously.

"It’s time to look at a new railway station in Anfield, as proposed in Merseytravel's Long Term Rail Strategy."

Mr Carden added: "North Liverpool is poorly served by the insufficient public transport links. Currently, neither of our two Premier League football clubs have suitable rail services.

"If LFC is serious about expanding the capacity and use of the stadium, they should be part of that conversation and helping to bring the new railway station forward as part of their plans."

Any Anfield station would most likely be on the Bootle branch line, which branches off at Wavertree and runs through Walton and Anfield towards Bootle. It's currently used for freight services to and from the Port of Liverpool, but not by passenger services.

Merseyrail's Long Term Rail Strategy lists many potential future rail projects . They include electrification of the Bootle branch to allow passenger services to run to Lime Street.

But the report offers a note of caution over the Anfield plans. It suggests work on the branch line plan is unlikely to start until 2022.

It also ranks potential new stations according to how well their business case performed and on whether they are short or long-term projects.

Anfield is listed as a "long-term scheme" that "performed less well".

In 2008, the Liverpool Daily Post reported that Liverpool FC, Merseytravel and Liverpool council were considering three possible sites for a station to serve the proposed Stanley Park stadium: Utting Avenue, near The Clarence pub, Stanley Park Avenue, near Anfield Cemetery, and Pinehurst Avenue, near its junction with Townsend Lane/Avenue (near Clubmoor Playing Fields).

A Merseytravel spokesperson said: "A railway station serving the Anfield area remains a long term aspiration and is included within our Long Term Rail Strategy.

"However, there are many issues to be resolved, not least understanding how rail freight growth from the expanded Port of Liverpool could impact on capacity on the Bootle Branch Line – the route where a potential Anfield station could be located.

"It would be necessary to develop a business case, secure funding and understand the scale of the project required to deliver a potential station.”

https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/business/could-anfield-railway-station-solve-15094740
 

Simon Jones

Cut my veins open and I bleed Liverpool red
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
77
Is that possible for railways to new train station on Goodies stadium in the future when Everton move to new one? Telling that to them! Lol
 

dockers_strike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2017
Messages
740
He doesnt know what he's talking about and that's not right saying the outline planning application has expired. The outline planning application runs to Sept \ Oct 2019 not 2018.

https://www.dailypost.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/liverpool-fc-still-plan-redevelop-14807953

The fact he says an extension to the Kop 'might be easier' shows he has absolutely no knowledge of building works never mind the ability to increase the Kop which is, vitually impossible.
 
Last edited: