The Singaporean Liverpool Never Managed To Sign
- Aug 5, 2008
To me our best midfield pairing is still Lucas and Gerrard. If both are fit, they should start always as the first choice pairing.
Mate...you're a total wum - sign falcao, blindly believe in SG even if he's not on form (as he hasn't been for a while)Still?? What kinda Q is that?
Ofcourse he should be starting. Is there a better player than him who can take his place? No.
Shelvey is not half the player...Gerrard is. If Shelvey buys glasses he might come a little close but that's about it.
Thanks for believing.
Did you even read his post?Mate...you're a total wum - sign falcao, blindly believe in SG even if he's not on form (as he hasn't been for a while)
thank god for ignore.
My take on SG is that if we had a better team, with his current form he'd be benched...fortunately for him he's not got players challenging him. Next season he will do....
I think people are reading too much into the system and theories of how each player would fit into it. So far the only player that has the same ability to take the team forward all by himself when need be is Suarez, the rest are merely bystanders or inexperience. Gerrard over the past two seasons had to shoulder defensive position and not able to just bomb forward without care of counter attacks. The supporting cast is just not good enough, and when people say there players don't move enough for Allen to find them, it goes the same with Gerrard when the only option he usually has infront of him is Suarez.Some people seem to want to see him benched just for the sake of benching him.
Any of the attacking three positions. He could even play 'false 9' in our system. Lets face it, he is probably the best finisher at the club.Mascot, I am curious....where would you prefer to see him?
Thanks mate. So much sense in that post.Did you even read his post?
He said "is there a better player who can take his place?no"
You said "If we had a better team, Gerrard wouldn't be playing"
How are they different?
Of course if we had a better player to take his place he wouldn't be playing. Fucking hell, that's some insight is that.
The point is, we don't. Isn't that the point of the thread, to be answering the question of whether Gerrard should currently be getting in the team?
As you said yourself, there aren't any better options, so obviously he should. It's that simple, how people are missing this point is beyond me. It has nothing to do with loyalties or sentimentality, even though Gerrard is miles away from anything like the form he produced from 2000-2009, he's still good enough to be getting in the side ahead of the competition we have at the moment.
Some people seem to want to see him benched just for the sake of benching him.
im 11 with more sense than uR U 12 M8?