The Unreliable Rumours Thread

MViper

TIA New Signing
Joined
Jul 7, 2007
Messages
104
There have been numerous stories that the De Ligt deal was done as well, but both parties are still denying it.
I know but Barcelona almost signed everybody even our own Moreno. lol But as far as I know there's nothing official on De Ligt front?
 

CymruRed

TIA Youth Team
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
639
De Ligt as far as i'm aware hasn't signed a pre-contract with anyone,last i heard a few days ago,was he turned United down on £250k a week contract next season and his agent Mina Riola said,although that would probably be his best offer (financially atm) there status as a club doesn't reflect where he wants to be right now.
 

Not Worthy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2015
Messages
1,064
De Ligt as far as i'm aware hasn't signed a pre-contract with anyone,last i heard a few days ago,was he turned United down on £250k a week contract next season and his agent Mina Riola said,although that would probably be his best offer (financially atm) there status as a club doesn't reflect where he wants to be right now.
Say it again.................Fecking music to my ears; 19yr old disses ManU
 

Kopstar

★★★★★
Joined
Jun 15, 2007
Messages
11,505
The appeal is being heard this Thursday (it's still within FIFA at the moment). If Chelsea wish to challenge the outcome of that appeal then they'll go to CAS. Chelsea would almost certainly seek a provisional suspension of any sanction from CAS (which they'd get) whilst the process then went through their procedures. They'd then have 8 weeks to complete the process before the international transfer window opens (9 June this year*). That could just be possible but it's touch and go.
*FIFA TMS now has the transfer window opening on the 11 June this year.
 

Red over the water

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 13, 2018
Messages
1,425
Does anyone know when the window opens?

Just kidding.

I’m not sure about De Ligt. Very good player, no doubt about that, but we have our own in Joe Gomez. His partnership with VVD in the first half of the season had the lot, and I want to see it resumed next season. Going deeper into the squad, Matip has done very well indeed and is a fine third choice. I’m not a fan of Lovren, particularly, and I see him as fourth choice and vulnerable to departure, mostly to play more.

If we sign De Ligt I won’t complain, but it would be overkill in that position in my opinion. De Ligt and Gomez would have a straight fight to partner VVD, so one VERY good young defender will miss out, right at the time they are carving out a career for themselves at the highest level, and needing to play. Matip will be pushed down the order and presumably Lovren will be off.
 

Retro Helix

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2016
Messages
367
Does anyone know when the window opens?

Just kidding.

I’m not sure about De Ligt. Very good player, no doubt about that, but we have our own in Joe Gomez. His partnership with VVD in the first half of the season had the lot, and I want to see it resumed next season. Going deeper into the squad, Matip has done very well indeed and is a fine third choice. I’m not a fan of Lovren, particularly, and I see him as fourth choice and vulnerable to departure, mostly to play more.

If we sign De Ligt I won’t complain, but it would be overkill in that position in my opinion. De Ligt and Gomez would have a straight fight to partner VVD, so one VERY good young defender will miss out, right at the time they are carving out a career for themselves at the highest level, and needing to play. Matip will be pushed down the order and presumably Lovren will be off.
True. Priority signing in defence must be backup for Robertson.
 

BigJon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2018
Messages
102
Just a small conspiracy theory...
Is it possible that LFC pulled out of the Fekir signing because Shaqiri (who was considerably cheaper) agreed to Sign? I recall it all happened around the same time.
 

EdWood

TIA Youth Team
Joined
Jun 2, 2011
Messages
5,737
True. Priority signing in defence must be backup for Robertson.
That being said, 3 of our 4 first team CBs are injury prone and Joe Gomez is one of them sad to say. VVD needs a partner alongside him who's going to be there for at least 30 games over a season. I'd rather it were Gomez as he's clearly a quality player but he keeps picking up serious injuries.

Lovren definitely needs replacing imo for 2 reasons: One, well he's not that good and two, he's been consistently unavailable for long stretches because of persistent niggles.
 

Red over the water

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 13, 2018
Messages
1,425
Just a small conspiracy theory...
Is it possible that LFC pulled out of the Fekir signing because Shaqiri (who was considerably cheaper) agreed to Sign? I recall it all happened around the same time.
My view on this one is a few circumstances prompted a bit of a rethink.

I think we were willing to give Karius a chance to bounce back. He had 10 clean sheets in 19 games last season, and there were mitigating factors in his errors in the final against Real Madrid. So we circled the wagons and got behind him... except he didn’t respond well. Had he come out and bossed it in preseason he might have put the final behind him and gone on to become a solid goalkeeper for us. But instead he went from not fully convincing to a bag of nerves. He kept making errors in preseason, and I’m certain that prompted a rethink.

Alisson became available, and with Courtois going to Madrid we needed to be decisive, and we were.

It was a smidge harsh on Karius, as he didn’t look too bad in half a season of football, again 10 clean sheets in 19, and it seemed there was something to build on, but he fell apart and so we snapped up the best in the business.

It’s tough at the top!

That had an impact on the overall budget, and once there were question marks over Fekir’s knee, it seemed our willingness to extend ourselves there evaporated, not least while we were nursing back to health another attacking midfielder with a big knee injury that wiped out a season. All of a sudden the risk-reward for Fekir didn’t stack up. Shaqiri was available for a deflated price, presumably some relegation special deal, so we took advantage. We added squad depth for £13M which is nothing really, and even if he hasn’t been close to a main player, he has made a contribution, and if we sold him we’d double our money.

Big signings in VVD, Keita, Fabinho and Alisson (not all summer) plus the question mark over Fekir’s knee, meant we went with a cheaper option in Shaqiri as the opportunity presented itself.

This summer I’m confident we will sign a higher quality player for the front third of the pitch, to rotate in with the main three and hopefully not drop the level.
 
Last edited:

redfanman

TIA Regular
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
12,230
My view on this one is a few circumstances prompted a bit of a rethink.

I think we were willing to give Karius a chance to bounce back. He had 10 clean sheets in 19 games last season, and there were mitigating factors in his errors in the final against Real Madrid. So we circled the wagons and got behind him... except he didn’t respond well. Had he come out and bossed it in preseason he might have put the final behind him and gone on to become a solid goalkeeper for us. But instead he went from not fully convincing to a bag of nerves. He kept making errors in preseason, and I’m certain that prompted a rethink.

Alisson became available, and with Courtois going to Madrid we needed to be decisive, and we were.

It was a smidge harsh on Karius, as he didn’t look too bad in half a season of football, again 10 clean sheets in 19, and it seemed there was something to build on, but he fell apart and so we snapped up the best in the business.

It’s tough at the top!

That had an impact on the overall budget, and once there were question marks over Fekir’s knee, it seemed our willingness to extend ourselves there evaporated, not least while we were nursing back to health another attacking midfielder with a big knee injury that wiped out a season. All of a sudden the risk-reward for Fekir didn’t stack up. Shaqiri was available for a deflated price, presumably some relegation special deal, so we took advantage. We added squad depth for £13M which is nothing really, and even if he hasn’t been close to a main player, he has made a contribution, and if we sold him we’d double our money.

Big signings in VVD, Keita, Fabinho and Alisson (not all summer) plus the question mark over Fekir’s knee, meant we went with a cheaper option in Shaqiri as the opportunity presented itself.

This summer I’m confident we will sign a higher quality player for the front third of the pitch, to rotate in with the main three and hopefully not drop the level.
I think we were always intending to sign Alisson if a deal could be had with Roma and the player, it had little to do with the final and didn't affect the budget.

There was money put aside for Fekir that apparently wasn't spent when we walked away from that deal, and is still there. The plan had been Fekir +1 other. Shaqiri was on the list of others but reportedly near the top of it. For whatever reason he was the only one picked.
 

redfanman

TIA Regular
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
12,230
As big a fan of Milner as i am, i am not sure i would be offering him a new contract given his age and style of play. At some point that is going to catch up with him. Unless the plan is to gradually phase him into the coaching set up.

As for the news about a new contract for Klopp, that would be great - a no brainer - however, doesnt he already have 3 years left on the current one - so talk of the 5 year deal means we only get an additional 2 years (which is obviously better than nothing but i would be much happier if it is 5 years in addition to the 3 remaining!) or is my maths wrong on this one?
 
Last edited:

big noyd

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2016
Messages
1,887
if gomez is going to be the primary backup at right back--and he is the fastest player on the team--there's room for somebody else at CB if lovren departs, as matip is frequently unavailable due to niggles

with keita & ox returning to the fold there should be less game time in midfield for milner, and he's shown that he can play left back at a pretty high level

unorthodox approach to fullback depth but maybe it's the direction we go in
 

Limiescouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
12,873
if gomez is going to be the primary backup at right back--and he is the fastest player on the team--there's room for somebody else at CB if lovren departs, as matip is frequently unavailable due to niggles

with keita & ox returning to the fold there should be less game time in midfield for milner, and he's shown that he can play left back at a pretty high level

unorthodox approach to fullback depth but maybe it's the direction we go in
We have unorthodox full backs. An unorthodox approach to supplementing/supporting what we have already is probably the best approach.

With the style we play and the things Trent and Robbo bring to the team I think we lose something with almost any other FB coming in no matter how good. The key to what they do is they are both proper footballers who could play at a decent level in midfield. I'd say wed do well to get better replacements than we already have in Milly, Gini, Hendo.
 

Speckydodge

TIA Squad Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
2,509
if gomez is going to be the primary backup at right back--and he is the fastest player on the team--there's room for somebody else at CB if lovren departs, as matip is frequently unavailable due to niggles

with keita & ox returning to the fold there should be less game time in midfield for milner, and he's shown that he can play left back at a pretty high level

unorthodox approach to fullback depth but maybe it's the direction we go in
It's the direction we've been going for quite a while now.
 

Iluvatar

Allez Allez Allez
Joined
Sep 13, 2015
Messages
6,937
Leverkusen have signed Demirbay, which could meant that Brandt leaves the club. Would be a terrific signing imo.

We were heavily linked with him as well (didn't believe it personally) he's a good player just not what we need. Brandt on the other hand, screams an Edwards/Klopp roadtrip to Blackpool type deal.


Really good article on potential attackers and why we'd be targeting them.. Brandt features.
 

nikz200

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
921
So Espn has us linked with James Maddison from Leicester. To be frank i don't rate the guy , i do rate Demarai Gray on their team who i think would be a excellent role player if we got him in. Brandt is a long shot, especially if Bayern Munich want him to replace Robben and Ribery.........

Also some Manchester united people claim the release clause for Dybala is 86mil pounds, which if is the case, we can all hope that we pull the trigger. Same if De Ligt is available.
 

DeathOrGlory

Fortune Favours the Gegenpress
Joined
Apr 29, 2011
Messages
6,949
Dybala seems like the kind of bloke who'd get a 200 page transfer thread all to himself, only for him to go to some other team and for it to turn out that he was never close to coming here after all.

Things are changing around here though, maybe it could happen. He's probably got a cunty agent who would push him towards Spain or something I feel though.
 



GaryBarlow99

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2015
Messages
456
Dybala seems like the kind of bloke who'd get a 200 page transfer thread all to himself, only for him to go to some other team and for it to turn out that he was never close to coming here after all.

Things are changing around here though, maybe it could happen. He's probably got a cunty agent who would push him towards Spain or something I feel though.
His brother is his agent apparently. Seems a relative can be even worse to deal with if you look at Neymar, Rabiot, etc.

I'd love Dybala. He was the one I would have looked at as soon as the Fekir deal collapsed. We'll see what happens but if we are offering a new deal to Origi and Brewster will be given games next year we might only bring in one attacking player this summer.
 

Jah_Pool

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 6, 2014
Messages
572
So Espn has us linked with James Maddison from Leicester. To be frank i don't rate the guy , i do rate Demarai Gray on their team who i think would be a excellent role player if we got him in. Brandt is a long shot, especially if Bayern Munich want him to replace Robben and Ribery.........

Also some Manchester united people claim the release clause for Dybala is 86mil pounds, which if is the case, we can all hope that we pull the trigger. Same if De Ligt is available.
If we go for any Foxes players, I would hope its Tielemans. This kid has the size and the eye for goal that we should be looking for. In 13 games for the Foxes he's had 3 goals and 5 assists from midfield. I would take a punt on him replacing MIlner or Lallana
 

Speckydodge

TIA Squad Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
2,509
If we go for any Foxes players, I would hope its Tielemans. This kid has the size and the eye for goal that we should be looking for. In 13 games for the Foxes he's had 3 goals and 5 assists from midfield. I would take a punt on him replacing MIlner or Lallana
He's still a Monaco player and there's no agreed fee clause with Leicester. Was always a massive talent, really wanted us to go after him at anderlecht. He's showed how well suited to the league he is too.
 

MarkMcC

TIA Squad Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2007
Messages
3,303
Was shocked to see him some how end up at Leicster but not so surprised to see the impact he's had. Wonder what kind of fee would be looked to sign him permanently?
 

Limiescouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
12,873
Was shocked to see him some how end up at Leicster but not so surprised to see the impact he's had. Wonder what kind of fee would be looked to sign him permanently?
I dont think it would take much to sign him. Monaco got him relatively cheaply (about 20 million) and while hes still got a few years left on that contract, hes not done much to justify them making a big increase on that.