The Unreliable Rumours Thread

Prolix

Long Time Nemesis™
Ad-free Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2012
Messages
3,160
I think the key thing about signing Andy Robertson was that he didn't have Andy Robertson ahead of him in the team, which a new LB would.

IMO there's no way (or it's very, very unlikely) that a 22 year old, promising player coming off the back of playing 20+ (probably) Premier League games is going to make the decision to sit on the bench behind Robertson and allow his development to stall. No matter how strenuous a Klopp/Lijnders training session is, there is no substitute for playing time in competitive games. I know @Anfield rd Dreamer is going to get his calculator out and start telling me that there's X number of theoretical starts for a player not named A. Robertson every season, but there is simply no clear pathway into the team that looks any better than getting disjointed appearances in cup competitions and perhaps during the winter. You can't even tell a player that if they work hard and listen to the coaches in training then in three years they can be starting >50% of matches. Robertson will be 28. It's even going to be a stretch to manage the situation with Neco Williams on the right side into his early 20s if he keeps developing how we hope.

This was (is) the brilliance of Milner: beyond the consideration that an ageing midfielder could be a better fit stylistically for us than many "natural" fullbacks out there, Milner has continued to pick up minutes all over the field. It seems this season he is finally having to accept that they are going to be chosen in a more thoughtful manner, but one to two seasons ago he didn't have to worry about where his next game was coming from.

One possible way around this conundrum would be a LB/LCB hybrid, but it's difficult to imagine a player who could excel at both of those roles in this Liverpool side where the responsibilities are so different. Gomez shared time with Trent at RB in 17/18, but I don't think there was ever any doubt in anyone's mind about which of them was going to make that position his in the long term.

I think the unorthodox approach to providing cover for such a specialised* position has served us well so far and I imagine that Klopp and co. will continue to operate in this way. They have the players they want to be starting 90% of games in those positions; filling that other 10% requires some creative thinking with other assets in the squad. It's rather Totaalvoetbal in the sense that a hardworking, versatile, tactical, and intelligent player has a role almost anywhere in this Klopp side. Cloning Milner would probably be a more efficient use of resources than throwing money at young players who are known and hyped by every team in the league.

Speaking very hypothetically, if we are blessed to end up in a situation where Williams and Trent are both genuinely good enough to be starting players for Liverpool (the odds of this are low, if we are realistic) then I could see Trent doing a reverse-Milner and picking up minutes elsewhere on the pitch. But that is a situation we can only deal with if we get to it, and as of right now I would not plan on TAA being a midfielder.

(* The more I think about it, the more it feels inaccurate to call our fullbacks "specialised". I don't think Klopp has a dogmatic/prescriptive idea that a Liverpool fullback has to duplicate the talents of Robertson and TAA [who are quite different themselves]. I think the success of Milner at LB under Klopp suggests instead that the fullbacks are a generalist position which requires a very high and broad level of skills rather than uniquely specific skills.)
 
Last edited:

jim bouki

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2018
Messages
66
After the minamino signing i can see us buying Shrewsbury's left back. Kept young Harvey Elliot in his back pocket all game. Infinitely better than Lucas Digne and could probably auction off just one of Mo Salah's shoelaces to cover the cost and then some.
 

Anfield rd Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Ad-free Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
12,163
I think the key thing about signing Andy Robertson was that he didn't have Andy Robertson ahead of him in the team, which a new LB would.

IMO there's no way (or it's very, very unlikely) that a 22 year old, promising player coming off the back of playing 20+ (probably) Premier League games is going to make the decision to sit on the bench behind Robertson and allow his development to stall. No matter how strenuous a Klopp/Lijnders training session is, there is no substitute for playing time in competitive games. I know @Anfield rd Dreamer is going to get his calculator out and start telling me that there's X number of theoretical starts for a player not named A. Robertson every season, but there is simply no clear pathway into the team that looks any better than getting disjointed appearances in cup competitions and perhaps during the winter. You can't even tell a player that if they work hard and listen to the coaches in training then in three years they can be starting >50% of matches. Robertson will be 28. It's even going to be a stretch to manage the situation with Neco Williams into his early 20s if he keeps developing how we hope.

This was (is) the brilliance of Milner: beyond the consideration that an ageing midfielder could be a better fit stylistically for us than many "natural" fullbacks out there, Milner has continued to pick up minutes all over the field. It seems this season he is finally having to accept that they are going to be chosen in a more thoughtful manner, but one to two seasons ago he didn't have to worry about where his next game was coming from.

One possible way around this conundrum would be a LB/LCB hybrid, but it's difficult to imagine a player who could excel at both of those roles in this Liverpool side where the responsibilities are so different. Gomez shared time with Trent at RB in 17/18, but I don't think there was ever any doubt in anyone's mind about which of them was going to make that position his in the long term.

I think the unorthodox approach to providing cover for such a specialised* position has served us well so far and I imagine that Klopp and co. will continue to operate in this way. They have the players they want to be starting 90% of games in those positions; filling that other 10% requires some creative thinking with other assets in the squad. It's rather Totaalvoetbal in the sense that a hardworking, versatile, tactical, and intelligent player has a role almost anywhere in this Klopp side. Cloning Milner would probably be a more efficient use of resources than throwing money at young players who are known and hyped by every team in the league.

Speaking very hypothetically, if we are blessed to end up in a situation where Williams and Trent are both genuinely good enough to be starting players for Liverpool (the odds of this are low, if we are realistic) then I could see Trent doing a reverse-Milner and picking up minutes elsewhere on the pitch. But that is a situation we can only deal with if we get to it, and as of right now I would not plan on TAA being a midfielder.

(* The more I think about it, the more it feels inaccurate to call our fullbacks "specialised". I don't think Klopp has a dogmatic/prescriptive idea that a Liverpool fullback has to duplicate the talents of Robertson and TAA [who are quite different themselves]. I think the success of Milner at LB under Klopp suggests instead that the fullbacks are a generalist position which requires a very high and broad level of skills rather than uniquely specific skills.)
Err what I actually said was;

"However I think it's much more likely that we get a multi positional player who covers LB as one of his positions if Larouci isn't seen as being ready within the next 18 months."

Maybe someone who can stay wide left throwing crosses in Robertson style with his left foot (and defensive enough to get away with playing LB) but able to cut inside from RW and take shots with his left foot too? Or able to play as a combative playmaker in CM whilst also being a good enough LB option kind of like Fabinho being our starting DM but has historically played an awful lot at RB or how people keep predicting Alexander-Arnold will be used in CM? Think the player will likely be a cover player primarily though. Like Minamino seems to be.
 

costared

TIA Reserve Team
Joined
Aug 27, 2010
Messages
3,557
Must admit I am a bit dissapointed that we have not strengthend important positions through 2 transfer windows while we were in a strong porition to do so financially and from the point of view that as Euro champs we were/are would be a club players would want to join. We do need cover for Robbo and we also need another good stiker. If any of our front 3 get injured we could struggle for goals. Origi has put in some heroic performances but is not consistent enough. I am far from convinced Minanino is good enough particularly as a central striker. Shaqu is injured to often and is not exactly a goal machine. Furthermore we have no one at the academy who is anywhere near ready to even get a sniff.
 

Prolix

Long Time Nemesis™
Ad-free Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2012
Messages
3,160
Err what I actually said was;

"However I think it's much more likely that we get a multi positional player who covers LB as one of his positions if Larouci isn't seen as being ready within the next 18 months."

Maybe someone who can stay wide left throwing crosses in Robertson style with his left foot (and defensive enough to get away with playing LB) but able to cut inside from RW and take shots with his left foot too? Or able to play as a combative playmaker in CM whilst also being a good enough LB option kind of like Fabinho being our starting DM but has historically played an awful lot at RB or how people keep predicting Alexander-Arnold will be used in CM? Think the player will likely be a cover player primarily though. Like Minamino seems to be.
That was sloppy on my part, it sounds like we very much agree. I was just making a little joke about your line of reasoning when talking about forward depth. I should have been more clear that I was responding to the general suggestion of Lewis, not replying specifically to you. (y)
 

Anfield rd Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Ad-free Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
12,163
That was sloppy on my part, it sounds like we very much agree. I was just making a little joke about your line of reasoning when talking about forward depth. I should have been more clear that I was responding to the general suggestion of Lewis, not replying specifically to you. (y)
That's ok no worries. Do think depth is important but not too much depth. 2 senior, established, international level, players per position is too much. Especially if we want to introduce youth players from our academy. I'd say there should be 15 outfield players that are "starter" standard that cover every starting position in 433 and 4231 twice between them. On top of that maybe 10 players who range from Shaqiri style cover players to Jones style prospects who, between them offer another option or two to each role. I think signing a RB and a LB would be overkill. One player who can play LB and another position or two would be fine he could cover LB for the times Robertson doesn't play and still get game time elsewhere. Think its arguable we don't need that player right now with Milner around but he will be needed at some point and should be good enough to be one of the "15" I mentioned. Also believe we need the same up top as we have too many squad cover players and youth prospects and not enough in terms of top quality for the here and now (although what we have got is obviously as good as we could want). Just my opinion obviously.
 

Richard88

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
525
The comments by Wijnaldum today suggest that there's a difference in how much the club want to commit compared to what sort of commitment he himself wants, in terms of years and salary.

Wijnaldum's current contract expires in 2021, by which time he'll be close to 31. That fact undoubtedly makes it quite unlikely that the club will want to offer him a lucrative long-term contract, and the best he could probably expect is something along the lines of what Milner got, which is probably going to edge him towards going elsewhere where he can secure a longer deal.

On another note, in that same article it mentions that the club has the option to extend Lovren's contract by another year beyond 2021, which is really positive for two reasons. Firstly, it means that the club won't be forced to settle for a lesser return in the transfer market. And secondly, it means that the club can hold onto him as 4th choice CB for a little bit longer which could be the optimal timing with regards to Hoever and/or Van den Berg's development as his replacement.
 

gasband

The Singaporean Liverpool Never Managed To Sign
Ad-free Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2008
Messages
5,511
Must say this is one of the quietest winter window for a long time.
 

Speckydodge

TIA Squad Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
2,674
Must say this is one of the quietest winter window for a long time.

I've found I'm so comfortable with it that I don't even know what's going on with the other teams in the window. I'd usually hear every rumour from constant searching of possible news for us but these days it's like oh United are overpaying for him ? Meh
 

Mascot88

Yours for £1m. Need to make room for Dean Saunders
Admin
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
22,781
We were less of a club when we bought Robertson for less than 10 million and I'm not convinced he made the move believing he would be our 100% guaranteed week in week out starter.
Of course he did.

Whether it’s a conversation with Klopp, his agent, or just puzzling it out by himself, he can look at that Liverpool side and see that his competition for a starting place are a veteran midfielder who doesn’t want to play there, and an odd lad in the last year of his contract who the fans don’t like and doesn’t seem to know how to play football. There is no hot academy prospect that he is going to be competing with. Whether he thinks he is getting in straightaway or he’s going to have to bide his time a bit, he can see a route to the first team and the move makes sense.

Any left back we target now is going to see the World’s Best Left Back ahead of them, and unless they have delusional levels of self belief, have completely understandable questions about where they get their game.
 

Anfield rd Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Ad-free Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
12,163
Of course he did.

Whether it’s a conversation with Klopp, his agent, or just puzzling it out by himself, he can look at that Liverpool side and see that his competition for a starting place are a veteran midfielder who doesn’t want to play there, and an odd lad in the last year of his contract who the fans don’t like and doesn’t seem to know how to play football. There is no hot academy prospect that he is going to be competing with. Whether he thinks he is getting in straightaway or he’s going to have to bide his time a bit, he can see a route to the first team and the move makes sense.

Any left back we target now is going to see the World’s Best Left Back ahead of them, and unless they have delusional levels of self belief, have completely understandable questions about where they get their game.
There is no way Klopp guarantees anything to anyone he signs. You earn a place in the side through a combination of working hard in training and playing well on the pitch.

I also think you are looking back on Robertson with hindsight too much and not giving a fair reflection on that summer when it came to left backs here.

Milner had just had a very good season at left back setting a Champions League assist record (I think was that year) and the only real issue was he tired out towards the end and performance dropped off due to overplaying.

Moreno had two years left and was looking a lot better than previously, he played as first choice LB first half of the season and it was his best period for us in his time here.

We obviously wanted a left back and a young one too (we had tried and failed to get Chilwell) and as with any player under Klopp there will always be a route to being a starter as it's a meritocracy here. I've no idea if Robertson expected to win a starting role or not but he knew he wasn't going to be handed one.

He was a cheap acquisition from a relegated side (was he even their player of the year?) in much the same kind of deal as Shaqiri (another not expected to be a starter and who hasn't earned a starting role) and largely a player swap with us for Kevin Stewart, another cover player who we were calling time on at that point.

I do agree however that a pure left back isn't going to fancy their chances of much football here if that's their only playing position.

Kind of limits us to 3 option;

1, inexperienced young players wanting to develop under Klopp.
2, older veterans wanting season or two at a top side with trophies.
3, limited journey men content their lot in life is to ride the bench.

None of which would be ideal especially the journey man option. That's why I've been saying my choice and prediction is a player who plays more than one position but is a good, strong option at LB. Like Milner is/has been.

I'm also not as convinced as some that there will definitely be movement on this in this summer as Klopp may give more time to see how Larouci develops and Milner is still there providing what we arguably need anyway. Just even Milner is finally starting to slow down a bit and Milner at LB in 2020 is not as good as Milner at LB in 2017 was.
 

Mascot88

Yours for £1m. Need to make room for Dean Saunders
Admin
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
22,781
There is no way Klopp guarantees anything to anyone he signs. You earn a place in the side through a combination of working hard in training and playing well on the pitch.

I also think you are looking back on Robertson with hindsight too much and not giving a fair reflection on that summer when it came to left backs here.

Milner had just had a very good season at left back setting a Champions League assist record (I think was that year) and the only real issue was he tired out towards the end and performance dropped off due to overplaying.

Moreno had two years left and was looking a lot better than previously, he played as first choice LB first half of the season and it was his best period for us in his time here.

We obviously wanted a left back and a young one too (we had tried and failed to get Chilwell) and as with any player under Klopp there will always be a route to being a starter as it's a meritocracy here. I've no idea if Robertson expected to win a starting role or not but he knew he wasn't going to be handed one.

He was a cheap acquisition from a relegated side (was he even their player of the year?) in much the same kind of deal as Shaqiri (another not expected to be a starter and who hasn't earned a starting role) and largely a player swap with us for Kevin Stewart, another cover player who we were calling time on at that point.

I do agree however that a pure left back isn't going to fancy their chances of much football here if that's their only playing position.

Kind of limits us to 3 option;

1, inexperienced young players wanting to develop under Klopp.
2, older veterans wanting season or two at a top side with trophies.
3, limited journey men content their lot in life is to ride the bench.

None of which would be ideal especially the journey man option. That's why I've been saying my choice and prediction is a player who plays more than one position but is a good, strong option at LB. Like Milner is/has been.

I'm also not as convinced as some that there will definitely be movement on this in this summer as Klopp may give more time to see how Larouci develops and Milner is still there providing what we arguably need anyway. Just even Milner is finally starting to slow down a bit and Milner at LB in 2020 is not as good as Milner at LB in 2017 was.
When Robertson signed his competition was Milner (who’d had a fine season, but clearly didn’t want to play the position) and Moreno (who was shite).

Moreno did indeed have a good start to the season, but at the time Robbo signed, Alby was the lad that Klopp had bombed out for a midfielder who didn’t want to play there.

There is obviously a route into the first team at left back for a decent player in summer 2017. In summer 2020 that position is locked down by the best in the world, and it’s a tough sell to suggest any full back is going to get plenty of games.

By the way, Andy famously knocked on Klopp’s door a few months into his time here and asked Klopp what he needed to do to get into the first team (which impressed Klopp, as most players would ask ‘why aren’t I in the first team’). Robbo did what he was told to do and got his place.

What do you think a young full back knocking on Klopp’s door now is told? It is a meritocracy, but the answer is something along the lines of ‘be better than Andy Robertson’. There’s not many full backs across Europe who can respond to that.
 

Limiescouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
15,254
Alby's good start to the season was the season Robbo joined. He then got injured which led to Robbo coming into the side and making the place his own. When Alby did get a run out he had reverted to his earlier error prone self.
And it wasn't really a good start to the season. It was a period of comparatively reduced calamity, but it was still not objectively good in either direction. It's relevant that the prevailing narrative for most of the first few months was why that Scottish lad we'd brought in who looked so good in that one early game he was given wasnt being played.
 

redfanman

TIA Regular
Ad-free Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
14,644
And it wasn't really a good start to the season. It was a period of comparatively reduced calamity, but it was still not objectively good in either direction. It's relevant that the prevailing narrative for most of the first few months was why that Scottish lad we'd brought in who looked so good in that one early game he was given wasnt being played.
I thought that narrative was driven by peoples long term distrust of Alby. I think other than the 3 goals we conceded to draw the Sevilla game, he had done well.
 

Limiescouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
15,254
I thought that narrative was driven by peoples long term distrust of Alby. I think other than the 3 goals we conceded to draw the Sevilla game, he had done well.
He is not a good player. It is that simple. His performances reflected that despite them being comparatively better due to the relative lack of major fuck ups.
 

Anfield rd Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Ad-free Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
12,163
When Robertson signed his competition was Milner (who’d had a fine season, but clearly didn’t want to play the position) and Moreno (who was shite).

Moreno did indeed have a good start to the season, but at the time Robbo signed, Alby was the lad that Klopp had bombed out for a midfielder who didn’t want to play there.

There is obviously a route into the first team at left back for a decent player in summer 2017. In summer 2020 that position is locked down by the best in the world, and it’s a tough sell to suggest any full back is going to get plenty of games.

By the way, Andy famously knocked on Klopp’s door a few months into his time here and asked Klopp what he needed to do to get into the first team (which impressed Klopp, as most players would ask ‘why aren’t I in the first team’). Robbo did what he was told to do and got his place.

What do you think a young full back knocking on Klopp’s door now is told? It is a meritocracy, but the answer is something along the lines of ‘be better than Andy Robertson’. There’s not many full backs across Europe who can respond to that.
What part of me saying what I said is arguing for a player who only plays left back? You're arguing against something I'm not saying.

I think what has this confused is that in summer 2017 would Robertson, at that stage of his career, have accepted a role of a journey man largely riding the bench, providing cover, for Robertson in 2020, best left back in the world?

I think he probably would have if it was his only decent option of getting out of relegated Hull but it would have been a coin toss between accepting that or instead moving to a Southampton or a Newcastle as a starter.

It's not cut and dry and some players do make moves that they know they will be back up only in (although it's less common in defence as there is less rotation). Adrian for instance, Shaqiri and Minamino too.

Robertson in 2017 was an unrefined gem waiting to be polished and exposed as fucking priceless. If he never had that conversation with Klopp he may have continued vying with Moreno that season and we may have eventually purchased a more established LB to be the starter with Robertson as back up for a season or two before moving on elsewhere like Shaqiri will probably do this summer.

Not all players expect to play week in week out. However they expect to get the chance if the player in front of them is rubbish. Andy was probably sitting thinking "well Milner isn't even getting played LB any more so I'm only competing with Moreno who isn't all that, theres got to be a way I can get myself first choice here I just need to find out how"!

And if Shaqiri or Minamino was competing with Downing instead of our current front 3 they'd probably be in same boat as Robertson was then. That doesn't mean they made the moves here expecting to get a chance to start but if the chance had presented itself (say we switch permanently to 4231 with Salah up top) you can be sure they would jump at the chance to seize a starting role just like Robertson did with Milner no longer playing LB after arguably being best LB in the league the year before.

I don't think players of the level of Robertson in 2016/17 would be out of our reach to bring in solely as back up IF we decided that was what we wanted to do. I don't think that is what we need or what we will do though.

I expect that, when we do decide we need a LB, we will target a high quality player who plays left back well as well as playing at least one other position (RB/CM/wing).

Klopp isn't the type of manager to want 20 full, senior, international level outfield players with 2 for each position. It leaves no room for youth development and creates unhappy players when one of the options is clearly better than the other, because there will be less rotation.

Klopp is more likely to have a core group of around 15 outfield players of the best possible quality who can cover all positions between them due to versatility. He will then have the best academy prospects getting chances and a few cover players just where we are a little weaker at with the first 15 and/or don't have the best options from the academy for.
 

Richard88

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
525
Having Milner signed for another 2 years makes it much less urgent to find another LB, and should the right player not present himself this summer I think Klopp would be perfectly fine with going into next season with the same setup at LB.
 

Iluvatar

Allez (x6)
Ad-free Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2015
Messages
8,515
Having Milner signed for another 2 years makes it much less urgent to find another LB, and should the right player not present himself this summer I think Klopp would be perfectly fine with going into next season with the same setup at LB.
I think as a team we've moved on significantly from the level Milner can offer as a back up. Emergency cover in a game yes of course, but long term rotation option? I don't think so.

Just like Gomez playing right back has a big impact on our attacking ability, Milner is similar on the left.

We are getting to the point that the right back up for fullback could be a winger!
 

Mascot88

Yours for £1m. Need to make room for Dean Saunders
Admin
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
22,781
What part of me saying what I said is arguing for a player who only plays left back? You're arguing against something I'm not saying.
I don’t think I suggested you did? My disagreement is just around Robertson.

On the subject though, I do agree that full back cover comes from a utility player, but I don’t ever want to see us think we can play a Centre Back there. It’s an attacking position, and it needs an attack minded player.

I think what has this confused is that in summer 2017 would Robertson, at that stage of his career, have accepted a role of a journey man largely riding the bench, providing cover, for Robertson in 2020, best left back in the world?

I think he probably would have if it was his only decent option of getting out of relegated Hull but it would have been a coin toss between accepting that or instead moving to a Southampton or a Newcastle as a starter.
You never know what a players motivations are. I’d go to Liverpool FC to clean to toilets, but I’m a fan and not a player.

My point it’s that left back has gone from a position where any good player can see their route to the first team, to one where a specialist full back just won’t get a sniff.

In some cases a young player might decide its worth his while joining as cover and gambling on an injury*, or doing two years to try and raise their profile and work with a world class coach before moving on.

My only point is come in and displace Alby Moreno is a much more sellable scenario than come in and nudge out Andy Robinson.

*just as an aside, if I was a young left back being courted by LFC I’d be looking at Robbo and thinking, there’s a lad who’s run full stop for two and a half years, and is probably due a significant injury. Don’t want that to be the case, but just sayin’...

It's not cut and dry and some players do make moves that they know they will be back up only in (although it's less common in defence as there is less rotation). Adrian for instance, Shaqiri and Minamino too.
Yeah, but again the sell becomes a lot harder. Sometimes it also needs a bit of understanding in both side. A player might be interested in having Liverpool on their CV for a couple of years, but expect the club to be reasonable about facilitating another move when it crops up.

Robertson in 2017 was an unrefined gem waiting to be polished and exposed as fucking priceless. If he never had that conversation with Klopp he may have continued vying with Moreno that season and we may have eventually purchased a more established LB to be the starter with Robertson as back up for a season or two before moving on elsewhere like Shaqiri will probably do this summer.

Not all players expect to play week in week out. However they expect to get the chance if the player in front of them is rubbish. Andy was probably sitting thinking "well Milner isn't even getting played LB any more so I'm only competing with Moreno who isn't all that, theres got to be a way I can get myself first choice here I just need to find out how"!
Yeah, that’s what I’m saying. The role Andy now occupies in the squad was an open door to him. He just needed to walk through it.

My point is that backing up establish high performing players gets really, really hard. And there is a Groucho Marx type contradiction here. Is a lad who is content to be back up the kind of lad who we really want.

Look at Utd. It looks likes they’ve signed Bruno Fernandes. And the reason they’ve got him is because it’s obvious he’s a lot better than any of the shite they are currently playing (wait till Ole gets his hands on him though). This is a player that we were supposedly interested in, and it would be a lot harder to persuade him to come here, despite being a better club, more chance of trophies and working under a better manager.
 

Chewbazza

True Believer
Ad-free Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
9,802
I think as a team we've moved on significantly from the level Milner can offer as a back up. Emergency cover in a game yes of course, but long term rotation option? I don't think so.

Just like Gomez playing right back has a big impact on our attacking ability, Milner is similar on the left.

We are getting to the point that the right back up for fullback could be a winger!
This is why there was so much clamour for Sessegnon at the time. Could have provided cover for Robbo and Mané. Just unfortunate he wasn't ready to leave London.
 

Limiescouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
15,254
I think as a team we've moved on significantly from the level Milner can offer as a back up. Emergency cover in a game yes of course, but long term rotation option? I don't think so.

Just like Gomez playing right back has a big impact on our attacking ability, Milner is similar on the left.

We are getting to the point that the right back up for fullback could be a winger!
I don't see the comparison between Milner and Gomez. Milner has won two titles while playing primarily as a fairly orthodox winger, and that is evident with the way he plays at FB. For all the fawning over the crativity of the current 2 FBs, it was Milner the year before who broke the single season CL record for assists while playing as a LB. The issue with him as our back up is less the drop off in the one off games he is played, but his ability to play a physically demanding role 2 games a week should we lose Robbo for any length of time.
 

Iluvatar

Allez (x6)
Ad-free Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2015
Messages
8,515
This is why there was so much clamour for Sessegnon at the time. Could have provided cover for Robbo and Mané. Just unfortunate he wasn't ready to leave London.
Yep he was on our list I think. Not done a lot though at Spurs.
 

Iluvatar

Allez (x6)
Ad-free Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2015
Messages
8,515
I don't see the comparison between Milner and Gomez. Milner has won two titles while playing primarily as a fairly orthodox winger, and that is evident with the way he plays at FB. For all the fawning over the crativity of the current 2 FBs, it was Milner the year before who broke the single season CL record for assists while playing as a LB. The issue with him as our back up is less the drop off in the one off games he is played, but his ability to play a physically demanding role 2 games a week should we lose Robbo for any length of time.
Mainly the fact he has to cut in to his right to cross, which means Mane can get crowded out. It's a big reason Origi is an enigma on the left, he stays wide which forces Robertson inside v's Mane who cuts inside and Robertson does the overlap.

Maybe Milner + Origi is the key!
 

Limiescouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
15,254
I think that criticism is primarily a stylistic one given how productive he has continued to be as a FB despite often choosing to cut back. Yes, there are differences in the way he plays the position - he is not as dynamic anymore, and not quite as good at defending the far post - but in essence he gives us a pretty good analogue. He is an all around good footballer who contributes very well in the final third but is effective at contributing in all phases of the attack rather than simply by overlapping and putting in crosses. I would argue that you wont find another LB in the league who can do that as well as Milner, principally because we're essentially judging FBs by the standards we used to judge LMs in our 80s 442 approach.
 
Last edited:

redfanman

TIA Regular
Ad-free Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
14,644
I think that criticism is primarily a stylistic one given how productive he has continued to be as a FB despite often choosing to cut back. Yes, there are differences in the way he plays the position - he is now as dynamic anymore, he is not quite as good at defending the far post - but in essence he gives us a pretty good analogue. He is an all around good footballer who contributes very well in the final third but is effective at contributing in all phases of the attack rather than simply by overlaping and putting in crosses. I would argue that you wont find another LB in the league who can do that as well as Milner, principally because we're essentially judging FBs by the standards we used to judge LMs in our 80s 442 approach.
I think we could do worse than look for other midfielders to become the fill in full back if one is needed provided they offer a similar skill set to Milner.
 

Jimmyscase

DoctorJimmy: knee-high flying tackle specialist
Joined
May 18, 2016
Messages
5,108
Virgil wants to sign for Juventus at season end for an undisclosed fee. Norwegian rumour on Transfermarkt. Soz about the Norwegian original and German translation. Sources are supposedly reputable and close to the club (it doesn't say which club!)
It's bullshit of course but it is a rumour so belongs in this thread I believe:

Quelle: Sportsbibelen.com
Skal vi tro oppsiktsvekkende rapporter, ønsker Virgil van Dijk (28) å forlate Liverpool ved sesongslutt.

– Utrolig, men jeg hørte akkurat at Van Dijk vil vekk til sommeren. Det er snakk om Juventus. Dette er fra to gode kilder meget nære klubben.

Zur letzten Quelle vom 29.01.2020 - 15:41 Uhr
Die norwegische Ausgabe von Sportsbibelen.com schreibt über Aufsicht erregende Berichte, dass Virgil van Dijk einen Wechselwunsch zu Juventus zum Saisonende ausgesprochen hat.

Die Info käme von zwei guten, sehr vereinsnahen Quellen.

Wer es glaubt ...

The German has got a mistake in it so you can make of it what you will....