Only Suarez, Sturridge and Borini in that group would be as much/more of a goal threat though. Whether its Ince or not is immaterial to me but we need more options in the attack that can be relied upon to threaten their goal. We create plenty of chances as a team, we enjoy plenty of possession but we don't have enough players getting on the score sheet. I would ideally be bringing in one to challenge for starts (Gameiro/alternative) and one squad player challenging to come off bench (Ince/alternative). Both need to be capable of scoring more than anything else.Absolute pointless signing id was hoping we were just trying to drive up his price. With sturridge borini sterling Suarez suso assaidi who in that group is he better than.
Think scoring in championship is bit better indicator than scoring at youth level. Championship quality levels arent too much dissimilar to many of the lesser european leagues.Suso and sterling were more of a goal threat for the reserves and would think the two of them as well as assaidi would have made a bigger impact on the championship then ince.
From watching him for his position and type of player he is lacks the ability to trouble premiership defenders. Reminds me of a poorer version of a young pennant
Football transfer is business. Business is predicated by logic. There is not formula. Still waiting for you to "back off". Your comments are overwhelming. It's hard for me to counter them......You actually equate logic to football transfer.... wow. Didn't know there was a proper formula to this topic. Sincerely apologise.
Again, apologise for not seeing the logic behind the transfer business, since being predicated by logic, while there is no (not) formula. I was told any logic will have a formula behind it. Damn my freaking lecturer, they were stupid.... Again, sincerely apologise.Football transfer is business. Business is predicated by logic. There is not formula. Still waiting for you to "back off". Your comments are overwhelming. It's hard for me to counter them......
I think it was Ayre (or maybe Comolli?) that said that we offered him a better contract then Blackpool but he wanted to play regulary so he moved.If he was so great we would have offered him cash to stay in the 1st place.He wanted to leave us.Let us not do another Charlie Adam and buy a player off them at a inflated price coz he had a good season
Yeah "get me". That's what being a Liverpool supporter is all about. "Getting" your own. YNWAAgain, apologise for not seeing the logic behind the transfer business, since being predicated by logic, while there is no (not) formula. I was told any logic will have a formula behind it. Damn my freaking lecturer, they were stupid.... Again, sincerely apologise.
Fallows... get this fella or else!
Yes. It looks like we want to take advantage of the 35% sell on fee. Either get him back for cheap and develop and sell him back or that couple of millions that we will get due to the sell on fee. I am starting to think its the later.We'll probably go after Ince in the summer again. We want someone to exercise that sell-on fee otherwise we will likely lose it if he winds down his contract.
Correct me if Im wrong but wouldnt Coutinho be playing as one of the attacking three?Think we will give up on this now.
Unless Blackpool lower their demands to our offer think this is done and dusted and we have moved on with our priorities.
Think Downings form and Borinis return from injury has helped calm down concerns over strengthening the front three in this window.
Think Blackpools actions have now put Inces career back a bit, with what is happening their no way he will able to shine as much second half of season as first.
May go somewhere for cheap in summer but Blackpool aint getting what they are asking for now thats for sure.
Still think in five years time Ince will be a top Prem star but his dad and Oyston are really damaging his career between them.