Ok apparently my last response somehow pissed you off so I will try again.
"No because you are entering the business end of the season and need players who will make a rapid difference whether that be added quality and/or cover in a key position."
Some impact is still better than no impact. Going without or going with something that isn't perfect yet then the decision should be clear. One choice doesn't help you at all the other should help at least a little bit here and there.
"As a transfer window it is renowned for its inflated fees."
I really don't care. We are being intelligent enough with our money and hardly splashing the cash so if sometimes we spend a bit more to do business in a more convenient way for us then so be it.
"It just doesn’t suit Klopp’s approach."
I completely disagree with this vague generalisation. It suited Klopps approach bringing Van Dijk in during last winter. It's also by far the mid season point that has worked best for us under Klopp with regards to how the squad has been doing. VvD provided a real boost without which last season may well have failed off. And to go to my other posts VvD is now a rock solid foundation at the core of the squad. He's not a new player integrating in. All that was ironed out last season.
I already covered the VvD signing. Also, the VvD signing was a leftover issue from the previous summer.
I enjoy your posts normally so I don’t want to fall out with you. But you really can’t expect other posters not to get pissed off when you misrepresent their posts and continue to do so even when it is pointed out to you.
You don’t agree with me ...... fine ...... I am perfectly comfortable with that, but at least have the decency to agree with something I actually posted.