• Hey Guest!
    Enjoy the This Is Anfield Forums but want to remove the adverts? Now you can do so by clicking here.
    Thanks for your support!

Who would you buy?

Iluvatar

Allez (x6)
Ad-free Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2015
Messages
7,954
As someone mentioned Suarez not long ago (not that I think it would happen), he's got a knee problem for a while now (when you watch him it's easy to forget that he's got issues, as he can still look like a beast, but it seems like he isn't 100% anymore and perhaps won't last long at the highest level), he's trying to solve it by going through special treatment, but apparently he can't play much in one week and they will have to pick games more often from now on if it doesn't improve.
I love Suarez, but his time here is over I wouldn't be re-visiting. He'd want astronomical wages as well.
 


Zoran

Fighting like beavers.
Joined
Mar 8, 2007
Messages
18,279
Yes, I don't think it would happen, from multiple sides. Just throwing that info here for people who were talking about it not long ago.
 

The Elusive 19th

TIA Youth Team
Joined
Jan 30, 2011
Messages
5,017
LB and RB cover to give some rest to Robo and TAA. We can't expect them to cover 50-60 matches over a season. And we can't expect them to play 20 games over Dec and Jan.
 

Richard88

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
274
LB and RB cover to give some rest to Robo and TAA. We can't expect them to cover 50-60 matches over a season. And we can't expect them to play 20 games over Dec and Jan.
I don't think we need another RB, as evidenced by the fact that Clyne hasn't featured at all this season. What's the point in replacing him with yet another player, when we seem to be coping absolutely fine with Trent and Gomez rotating? In a pinch we've also got Milner and Fabinho who can do a stellar job if needed, along with Camacho who fits the profile (i.e. being good on the ball) more than Clyne does.

I do agree about needing a LB though, assuming that Moreno will be allowed to leave on a free next summer. Given the frequent links to Chilwell and Sessegnon in recent windows it would seem that Edwards and Klopp have their sights set on having a young English (homegrown) LB rotating with Robertson, which would make perfect sense. Some have mentioned Lewis as a potential option, but I remain unconvinced.
 

GaryBarlow99

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2015
Messages
605
I don't think we need another RB, as evidenced by the fact that Clyne hasn't featured at all this season. What's the point in replacing him with yet another player, when we seem to be coping absolutely fine with Trent and Gomez rotating? In a pinch we've also got Milner and Fabinho who can do a stellar job if needed, along with Camacho who fits the profile (i.e. being good on the ball) more than Clyne does.

I do agree about needing a LB though, assuming that Moreno will be allowed to leave on a free next summer. Given the frequent links to Chilwell and Sessegnon in recent windows it would seem that Edwards and Klopp have their sights set on having a young English (homegrown) LB rotating with Robertson, which would make perfect sense. Some have mentioned Lewis as a potential option, but I remain unconvinced.
We were also linked with Llloyd Kelly at Bristol recently. Think a LB will definitely be brought in over the summer but not a RB.
 



MW2833

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2018
Messages
674
How about we get a LB who can also play RB (better than clyne)?
Genius i know
 

Richard88

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
274
Here's what I think is probably going to happen next summer:

- Promote Grabara/Kelleher, or sign an experienced backup, to replace Mignolet (ideally someone homegrown, like Heaton).
- Promote Camacho to replace Clyne, who's role in the squad is redundant at this stage (Clyne has only played one league cup game this season).
- Sign a young homegrown LB to replace Moreno when his contract expires.
- Make a decision on Lallana. His role in the squad will diminish a lot once Keita is settled and Ox is back, and though he would be excellent depth he may want to move on to play regularly. His role as depth midfielder could also perhaps be replaced by Curtis Jones. Up to him if he stays or leaves.
- Make a decision on Harry Wilson. Could be a good depth option but gametime will probably be limited.
- Sign a top CF to replace Sturridge (who's contract expires next summer). For example, Timo Werner has only 12 months on his contract next summer and would be an astute signing.
- Decide which one of Solanke, Origi, and Brewster should be kept around as depth CF. Perhaps something like Origi sold, Solanke loaned, and Brewster kept as depth.

That would leave the squad for 2019/20 as follows:

--------------------- Alisson
----------- Grabara/Kelleher/New GK

Trent -------- Gomez ------- Van Dijk ----- Robertson
Camacho --- Matip -------- Lovren ------- New LB

--------------------- Fabinho
------------------- Henderson

--------- Wijnaldum ------------- Keita
---------- Milner ------------------ Ox
---------- Lallana/Jones

Salah -------------- Firmino -------------- Mané
Shaqiri ------------ New ST -------------- Wilson
--------------------- Brewster ---------------------


In summary:

Outgoing: Mignolet, Clyne, Moreno, Sturridge, Origi, and possibly Lallana.
Loan: Solanke, Grujic, et al
Incoming: Experienced homegrown GK, young homegrown LB, and a Top class CF/attacker. (For example, Heaton + Sessegnon + Werner).
 

Richard88

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
274
How about we get a LB who can also play RB (better than clyne)?
Genius i know
The team loses a lot of dynamism in attack by having a wrong-footed fullback. Just look at how many goals arise from quick crosses by both Robertson and Trent, which just weren't there last season with Milner cutting back onto his right all the time.

The squad is pretty set at RB anyways, so best to just recruit a player who can do a job at LB first and foremost.

Btw, given how solid Robertson is defensively it would probably make sense to have an alternate LB who excels more in an attacking sense (though ideally with as little defensive downside as possible. I.e. Not someone as inbalanced as Moreno).

For example, Sessegnon seems like such an obvious transfer target, given the previous transfer links; his homegrown status; the fact that Fulham will probably get relegated; that his contract expires in 18 months; and that he can play both LB and LW in an attacking fashion.
 

Richard88

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
274
Another thing to bear in mind with regards to the RB spot is the development of Ki-Jana Hoever who was recently signed from Ajax. He's only 17 in January but is already impressing for the u23's.

https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/mature-ki-jana-hoever-hailed-15532764
"'Mature' Ki-Jana Hoever hailed as Liverpool excitement grows over Dutch defender"

Obviously you don't want to pin the hopes of the first team on unproven youngsters, but with Camacho and Hoever there does seem to be pretty good long-term alternatives to solve the backup RB spot internally (not to mention the fact that the first team squad already has plenty of options between Trent, Gomez, Milner, Fabinho even after Clyne inevitably leaves).
 



ILLOK

In the Danger Zone.
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
15,743
Just read Matip is out for 6 weeks. I wonder if a CB signing is necessary in January?
Matip and Gomez should be back in the middle of January. Unless we get a couple of more bad injuries in that time I wouldn't see why we would buy another CB.

How about we get a LB who can also play RB (better than clyne)?
Genius i know
Having reliable, versatile players makes it much easier to get through these tricky periods in the season where games come every 3 games. Despite not being right backs Gomez and Milner are better footballers than Clyne and I'd pick either of them ahead of him without a doubt (probably Fabinho too). If we could get a left footed player who could either play CB or in midfield, they could cover left back and still offer more than Moreno.

As for the names...I've talked about Ake before, but if we could convince Hector to leave Cologne then that would be an even better solution.
 
Last edited:

Richard88

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
274
Just read Matip is out for 6 weeks. I wonder if a CB signing is necessary in January?
That's unfortunate, but I don't think there's any reason to sign a CB.

There's enough gap between fixtures in the next month that Lovren and Van Dijk should be able to manage to play them all, barring any more unfortunate injuries.

Sun 16th | United (H)
Fri 21st | Wolves (a)
Wed 26th | Newcastle (H)
Sat 29th | Arsenal (H)
Thu 3rd | City (a)
Mon 7th | Wolves (a) (FA cup)
Sat 12th | Brighton (a)
Sat 19th | Palace (H)
Wed 30th | Leicester (H)

Even if Lovren or Van Dijk would pick up a knock as well, using Phillips or Fabinho at CB in one or two fixtures wouldn't be the end of the world either, unless perhaps if it's against City or Arsenal.

Whatever the case, it's certainly quite unnecessary to sign yet another CB just to cover one or two fixtures. The CB depth is fine at the moment, and it would be extremely unlucky to have 3 of them out at the same time, let alone 2.
 

Abdel

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2016
Messages
618
That's unfortunate, but I don't think there's any reason to sign a CB.

There's enough gap between fixtures in the next month that Lovren and Van Dijk should be able to manage to play them all, barring any more unfortunate injuries.

Sun 16th | United (H)
Fri 21st | Wolves (a)
Wed 26th | Newcastle (H)
Sat 29th | Arsenal (H)
Thu 3rd | City (a)
Mon 7th | Wolves (a) (FA cup)
Sat 12th | Brighton (a)
Sat 19th | Palace (H)
Wed 30th | Leicester (H)

Even if Lovren or Van Dijk would pick up a knock as well, using Phillips or Fabinho at CB in one or two fixtures wouldn't be the end of the world either, unless perhaps if it's against City or Arsenal.

Whatever the case, it's certainly quite unnecessary to sign yet another CB just to cover one or two fixtures. The CB depth is fine at the moment, and it would be extremely unlucky to have 3 of them out at the same time, let alone 2.
Philips is injured too
 

Richard88

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
274
Philips is injured too
*facepalm* lol

Pretty sure we'd be fine with Fabinho next to Van Dijk in most fixtures. It's not really an issue though so long as Lovren and Van Dijk stay fit.

It's actually likely that Lovren would have come in for Matip anyways once he was back (which he is now) so it's not really an issue unless there's yet another injury. Bad timing either way though, as I'm sure Klopp would have wanted to rotate considerably in the coming weeks to keep everyone fresh for the run-in.
 



Kopstar

★★★★★★
Joined
Jun 15, 2007
Messages
13,923
He got subbed off against Everton 3 weeks ago and hasn't played since. Not sure what's up with him.
Yeah, I had seen that but couldn't see any reference to any injury. Odd one. Probably should discuss this in his player thread. Oh wait... :tongue:

Would be good to know more if anyone has any info.
 

SirBillShankly

Joe and Holly's Dad
Joined
Jan 8, 2011
Messages
10,359
Klavan, let's bring the King back as a stop gap.

We could also sign De Ligt.

Lets bring him in. Philips isn't good enough. 6 weeks is quite a few games and Dejan likes missing games. Don't fancy seeing Fabinho at CB.
 

Sweeting

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2008
Messages
8,823
He got subbed off against Everton 3 weeks ago and hasn't played since. Not sure what's up with him.
That game was his return from injury also, so he has likely aggrevated it.

Not that he should be considered for 1st team action anyway.
 

Herb

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
6,737
Fabinho did some minutes there in pre season. Would be amazed if Phillips was picked ahead of him.
 



SithBaare

From Doubters to Believers
Joined
Aug 10, 2017
Messages
2,007
Just read Matip is out for 6 weeks. I wonder if a CB signing is necessary in January?
Think so. 6 weeks isn't the longest amount of time but they would still need time to get back to match fitness after recovering from the injury. This also leaves our current defensive stocks threadbare. We don't have anyone except lovren and van dijk in the senior team. This has the potential to derail us

Don't know who we can get in January and whether the youngsters are able to come in and step up. If anyone can guide the youngsters and build them up , it has to be virgil.
 

Richard88

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
274
Think so. 6 weeks isn't the longest amount of time but they would still need time to get back to match fitness after recovering from the injury. This also leaves our current defensive stocks threadbare. We don't have anyone except lovren and van dijk in the senior team. This has the potential to derail us

Don't know who we can get in January and whether the youngsters are able to come in and step up. If anyone can guide the youngsters and build them up , it has to be virgil.
Most signings take time to settle, and by the time they'd be ready to feature Matip and Gomez would already be back.

Moreover, our fixtures in January and early February after City are good so we should be able to manage even if one of Fabinho/Wijnaldum/Phillips had to cover at CB for a bit:

Thu 3rd | City (a)
Mon 7th | Wolves (a) (FA cup)
Sat 12th | Brighton (a)
Sat 19th | Palace (H)
Fa cup 4th round
Wed 30th | Leicester (H)
Sat 2nd | West Ham (a)
Sat 9th | Bournemouth (H)
 

SithBaare

From Doubters to Believers
Joined
Aug 10, 2017
Messages
2,007
Most signings take time to settle, and by the time they'd be ready to feature Matip and Gomez would already be back.

Moreover, our fixtures in January and early February after City are good so we should be able to manage even if one of Fabinho/Wijnaldum/Phillips had to cover at CB for a bit:

Thu 3rd | City (a)
Mon 7th | Wolves (a) (FA cup)
Sat 12th | Brighton (a)
Sat 19th | Palace (H)
Fa cup 4th round
Wed 30th | Leicester (H)
Sat 2nd | West Ham (a)
Sat 9th | Bournemouth (H)
Any which way , it's highly unlikely that we'd be able to sign a CB who'll be ready to play against city on Jan 3rd. Just got to get through these matches and wrap lovren and van dijk in cotton wool till then. We should have a better understanding of when Gomez will return by then as it's only 5 weeks to his comeback now.

Getting two defenders injured is incredibly unlucky. Need to still be looking at getting a january transfer, maybe for Declan rice ? he hasn't signed a contract extension with west ham
 



Lowton_Red

No football club is successful without hard work.
Ad-free Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
2,196
Yeah, I had seen that but couldn't see any reference to any injury. Odd one. Probably should discuss this in his player thread. Oh wait... :tongue:

Would be good to know more if anyone has any info.
I found this in the Echo:

Currently, there isn't much in reserve. Academy youngster Nat Phillips impressed Klopp massively with his performances during the pre-season tour of America.

The 21-year-old defender would be the next in line but he's been hampered by an Achilles problem this season. He hasn't featured for Liverpool Under-23s since going off at half-time in the mini derby at Goodison last month.
 

SirBillShankly

Joe and Holly's Dad
Joined
Jan 8, 2011
Messages
10,359
Think so. 6 weeks isn't the longest amount of time but they would still need time to get back to match fitness after recovering from the injury. This also leaves our current defensive stocks threadbare. We don't have anyone except lovren and van dijk in the senior team. This has the potential to derail us

Don't know who we can get in January and whether the youngsters are able to come in and step up. If anyone can guide the youngsters and build them up , it has to be virgil.
I've heard on the grapevine Caulker's available:think: