• This website uses cookies. More information.
  • The This Is Anfield Forums community is moving to a new home. Click here for more information on the transition.

Who would you buy?

Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Caradoc

Guest
Yes ZB, Ake is a good shout and more realistic than De Ligt. Maybe we should have offered them £20m plus Solanke? One thing is without doubt, ILLOK would LOVE that signing.

I am (un)reliably informed that Ake is too small.

Keita Balde personality doesn't fit the profile of someone Klopp would want in his squad. Too much ego.


Considering that the level of player in the squad currently is so high, you'd think the club are looking at players of a higher calibre than Ake. He's not better than any of the 4 CB's at the club, nor does he have the potential to be. He's also listed as being 1.80 in height which is considerably shorter than what Klopp has clearly felt is important in his CB's.

Strangely enough you ‘liked’ that post SBS! ;-)



Personally, I think he looks a good option for LB/LCB.
 

Nikola

"Oh, history writer, don't close the pages yet!"
Admin
Joined
May 17, 2007
Messages
19,407
A lot of us suspected that Liverpool's squad depth wasn't what it was made out to be when, in certain matches, the bench consisted of, for example, Mignolet, Lovren, Moreno, Fabinho, Keita, Sturridge and Origi (I think there were one or two matches with this exact bench or a very similar one, usually it was a straight choice between Solanke and Origi).

It is usually unfair to judge the squad depth when an almost fully changed team takes to the field in a cup competition viewed as third or fourth priority but looking at their individual performances, I don't think anyone would expect a major upturn in form of Mignolet, Moreno or Sturridge if they played in Klopp's first choice XI. That's where Liverpool are lagging severely behind Man City and that's why I consider Man City favourites for the title.

I bitterly hope that none of these will have to be relied upon until the end of this season, otherwise Liverpool are screwed. From what I see, relative to what one considers to be Klopp's first choice XI and depending on their fitness, I think it's safe to say that Klopp fully counts on Matip, Lovren, Milner, Henderson and Shaqiri as his options in rotation, Keita to a certain extent, maybe even adding kids like Camacho and Brewster into equation, while the likes of Moreno, Sturridge and Origi are taken into consideration through necessity rather than quality.

From this summer on, I'd expect the latter three to be playing for new clubs, perhaps with Lallana following suit as he's proven he can't be relied upon at all due to perennial fitness issues. Given that strikers' clear-out has begun with Ings and Solanke, I wonder if Klopp might pull the trigger in January given the state of the squad and title race. Basically, their transfer fees, their and Sturridge's wages should cover for that new striker, whoever he is (unless Liverpool surprise us all by getting a top class, top dollar addition such as, say, Dybala, which I don't see happening).
 

Mascot88

Bootroom Member
Admin
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
24,404
I think we need to get used to few things after a few years with Klopp.

1. Klopp doesn’t not spend money if he feels he has a workable solution already at the club.

2. Klopp will treat his players as human being before viewing them as playing assets. If a players wants to leave, he’ll try to make it happen rather than force them to stay.

3. He seems to prefer a smaller, tighter squad than a bloated one. I don’t think he wants unhappy players, and sees this as a bigger problem than having fewer bodies than is ideal.

4. Klopp will rarely buy in the January window. He believes the quality is not there, and there is little point bringing in players whe thy would need a significant chunk of the ready of the season to adapt.

5. He sees the January window as a time to move players out if he doesn’t think they’ll get playing time.

I think these things are pretty evident from the way Klopp goes about his work. So I don’t expect any signings in January, as that simply isn’t the way that Klopp does things.
 

Mascot88

Bootroom Member
Admin
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
24,404
I don't think anyone would expect a major upturn in form of Mignolet, Moreno or Sturridge if they played in Klopp's first choice XI.
I agree about Mignolet (more because the Goalkeeper is almost playing a different game) but I think it’s harsh to say Moreno and Sturbridge wouldn’t look better playing in the first team. Mostly because we’ve seen that they do.

Last night Moreno was playing next to a Midfielder covering at CB, and with Curtis Jones ahead of him. That’s going to test the very best full backs.

Put him next to Van Dijk, and with Sadio Mane ahead of him, and you get a different player. He’ll still only use his right leg to stand on, and tackle like he’s doing a special move in Street Fighter II, but his flaws would be far less exposed than they were last night.
 

Zinedine Biscan

Spreading the word of St Igor
Moderator
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Messages
24,503
I agree about Mignolet (more because the Goalkeeper is almost playing a different game) but I think it’s harsh to say Moreno and Sturbridge wouldn’t look better playing in the first team. Mostly because we’ve seen that they do.

Last night Moreno was playing next to a Midfielder covering at CB, and with Curtis Jones ahead of him. That’s going to test the very best full backs.

Put him next to Van Dijk, and with Sadio Mane ahead of him, and you get a different player. He’ll still only use his right leg to stand on, and tackle like he’s doing a special move in Street Fighter II, but his flaws would be far less exposed than they were last night.
Gave this a like as while I do think Moreno's time is up and we need a better LB option, I do agree with the principle that many of the players fielded last night will be fine when swapped into a predominantly first-choice team as required. I think it's fairly obvious that a near-fully second & third choice XI is going to look disjointed and underwhelming, partly because that group of players will have rarely performed together as a group meaning that level of understanding simply isn't there, and partly because there's a reason these lads aren't forming the bulk of the first-XI.

Sure, we'll hit problems if half a dozen first-choice players all go down at the same time and we're forced to rely on a significant number of second-teamers, but you can mitigate the risk of that happening precisely by giving players rest when needed as we did last night. You simply can't expect the same group of 11 players to play 50+ games every season (plus international commitments every other summer meaning basically no rest) while genuinely competing on four fronts.

There are positions in need of improving, mainly because the stand-ins are too injury-prone, getting on a bit in years and/or are BR's last remnants who are not best suited to our current tactics and standing. But it's fewer than many are assuming based on one cup game away at a team that have already taken points off most of the top 6 in the league already.
 

Mascot88

Bootroom Member
Admin
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
24,404
Gave this a like as while I do think Moreno's time is up and we need a better LB option, I do agree with the principle that many of the players fielded last night will be fine when swapped into a predominantly first-choice team as required. I think it's fairly obvious that a near-fully second & third choice XI is going to look disjointed and underwhelming, partly because that group of players will have rarely performed together as a group meaning that level of understanding simply isn't there, and partly because there's a reason these lads aren't forming the bulk of the first-XI.

Sure, we'll hit problems if half a dozen first-choice players all go down at the same time and we're forced to rely on a significant number of second-teamers, but you can mitigate the risk of that happening precisely by giving players rest when needed as we did last night. You simply can't expect the same group of 11 players to play 50+ games every season (plus international commitments every other summer meaning basically no rest) while genuinely competing on four fronts.

There are positions in need of improving, mainly because the stand-ins are too injury-prone, getting on a bit in years and/or are BR's last remnants who are not best suited to our current tactics and standing. But it's fewer than many are assuming based on one cup game away at a team that have already taken points off most of the top 6 in the league already.
It’s always been like this. We used to moan we had no decent kids coming through because the only chance they’d get is when Rafa would play eleven of them in a cup and get knocked out.
 

Nikola

"Oh, history writer, don't close the pages yet!"
Admin
Joined
May 17, 2007
Messages
19,407
I agree about Mignolet (more because the Goalkeeper is almost playing a different game) but I think it’s harsh to say Moreno and Sturbridge wouldn’t look better playing in the first team. Mostly because we’ve seen that they do.

Last night Moreno was playing next to a Midfielder covering at CB, and with Curtis Jones ahead of him. That’s going to test the very best full backs.

Put him next to Van Dijk, and with Sadio Mane ahead of him, and you get a different player. He’ll still only use his right leg to stand on, and tackle like he’s doing a special move in Street Fighter II, but his flaws would be far less exposed than they were last night.
Having Van Dijk, Milner and Mane close to Moreno won't improve his rash tackling, blind crossing, nor his decision-making that borders on insanity, though, especially now that he feels undervalued and uncertain about his future at the club. It's not just about keeping his flaws hidden, I struggle to see what are the qualities he possesses that can justify his presence. He doesn't score goals, he doesn't assist goals, his overlaps are rarely timed well. Every time I see him play, I wonder how the hell did the club end up with him of all people.

Sturridge can probably have his uses, mainly to rest Firmino, in my opinion, provided the rest of the team can provide runs for his passes (he's undervalued in this aspect, I'd say) but I'd also be unsure of his contributions in a centre forward role. No pace, no acceleration anymore, and it's been a while since he even got into a good area to have a pop at goal.

I'm pretty downbeat about certain options that are at Klopp's disposal, especially looking at what he's up against at Man City and Tottenham, so I hope he can at least add some defensive cover in January - that Kelly lad, for example, is the kind of transfer you'd associate with this Liverpool, even though Klopp is reluctant to add to his squad in January. It would be great if Klopp had more options from the academy but I fail to see any of them beyond Camacho and, at a push, Brewster being ready to contribute until the end of the season.
 

Zoran

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2007
Messages
19,355
Still don't think Klopp will bring someone in, unless Lovren's injury proves to be more of a long term one (hopefully not, but we'll know more in a few days).
 

Mascot88

Bootroom Member
Admin
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
24,404
Having Van Dijk, Milner and Mane close to Moreno won't improve his rash tackling, blind crossing, nor his decision-making that borders on insanity, though, especially now that he feels undervalued and uncertain about his future at the club.
Yes it would. We’ve see that it does!

I’m not saying he isn’t shite on his own terms, and we do obviously need to do better. But there is a world of difference between having Van Dijk telling him what to do and Fabinho who, with respect to him, is going to be more concerned with his own performance in an unfamiliar position.

He has started two games this season (Cardiff and Burnley) and we won both comfortably, and he looked fine. He has also had a few appearances off the bench.

As a squad option he is alright. Not great. Not someone you’d be happy starting at the Etihad, but alright against the lesser clubs every now and then. The problem would be if you surrounded him with players who are also ‘alright’. That’s when he, or any squad player, would start to look exposed.
 

Nikola

"Oh, history writer, don't close the pages yet!"
Admin
Joined
May 17, 2007
Messages
19,407
Yes it would. We’ve see that it does!

I’m not saying he isn’t shite on his own terms, and we do obviously need to do better. But there is a world of difference between having Van Dijk telling him what to do and Fabinho who, with respect to him, is going to be more concerned with his own performance in an unfamiliar position.

He has started two games this season (Cardiff and Burnley) and we won both comfortably, and he looked fine. He has also had a few appearances off the bench.

As a squad option he is alright. Not great. Not someone you’d be happy starting at the Etihad, but alright against the lesser clubs every now and then. The problem would be if you surrounded him with players who are also ‘alright’. That’s when he, or any squad player, would start to look exposed.
To be fair, I didn't see the improvement you're speaking about, I thought he was average at best (then again, I also though Keita was decent last night, so there's that as well). Speaking specifically about that Burnley match, I think it was Moreno who got hooked because he was simply ineffective, with Liverpool winning the match after he was subbed off. I think you're giving him too much credit, even though I fully agree that Klopp's first choice XI does a lot to cover for his flaws.

I'm not judging him on two cup exits, just to make it clear, otherwise I'd be giving a lot of players both barrels. He just doesn't contribute enough in attack, in my opinion, to justify his defensive flaws and overall lack of football intelligence. As brutal as it sounds, I hope Klopp never has to rely on him and that we won't see him donning a Liverpool shirt again - unless Liverpool are leading comfortably in matches and Klopp decides to give Robertson a breather towards the end of said matches.
 

Danny Sarge

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2017
Messages
106
Zaha's quality but I'm not so sure that's true anymore. There are some really good wide players outside the top 6 - Richarlison, Pererya, Anderson and Fraser come to mind.

Fraser is very seriously underrated I feel, his delivery into the box is consistently excellent.
Totally agree that Fraser's a good player and very underrated in that matter but I think Zaha's class and in a big team (Like ours) he would shine.
 

Limiescouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
16,595
Ake, as mentioned by the poster above you, would actually be a really sound shout. Good quality in two positions, and would allow us to move on both Matip (simply injured too much to rely on) and Moreno and upgrade both positions, depth-wise, at a stroke. Rarely injured, afaik. Not sure how much he would cost, £30-40m maybe (pure speculation on my part and am in ignorance about his contract situation). We also seem to have a good relationship with Bournemouth when it comes to transfers. Could get behind a move like that.

VVD & Joe are the first-choice CB pairing now for the next 6 or 7 years, Lovren and Ake backing them up is pretty strong, although I would certainly have an eye on replacing Lovren in subsequent windows as and when the opportunity arises.
I know he played a fair bit at LB, but I think that was more a case of him being left footed and just what you do to blood a kid into a senior football (see Stevie). He certainly doesnt play the role in a way that would provide a legitimate challenge to Robbo in the role. The way he plays I think he is a more a DM/CB combo than a CB/LB combo player, and even then I dont think he has developed into quite the quality of CB I thought he would despite a couple of season of regular football now at Bournmouth.

Would it make sense though for us to have a player who could drop into any of 3 positions? Sure. Not sure it would make sense for him though given he would have to improve a ton to ever not be a distant second best in any of those roles. At this stage it would likely be more a repeat of the Zenden move...someone who looks like it makes sense on paper, but ends up being notably inferior than your other options in every role he is given leaving the fans to smack their heads whenever they see his name on the team sheet.
 

GermanRed

from doubters to believers to sky-high achievers
Joined
Jan 26, 2017
Messages
4,906
I know he played a fair bit at LB, but I think that was more a case of him being left footed and just what you do to blood a kid into a senior football (see Stevie). He certainly doesnt play the role in a way that would provide a legitimate challenge to Robbo in the role. The way he plays I think he is a more a DM/CB combo than a CB/LB combo player, and even then I dont think he has developed into quite the quality of CB I thought he would despite a couple of season of regular football now at Bournmouth.

Would it make sense though for us to have a player who could drop into any of 3 positions? Sure. Not sure it would make sense for him though given he would have to improve a ton to ever not be a distant second best in any of those roles. At this stage it would likely be more a repeat of the Zenden move...someone who looks like it makes sense on paper, but ends up being notably inferior than your other options in every role he is given leaving the fans to smack their heads whenever they see his name on the team sheet.
I like Joe Gomez as a RB option and i think there will be situations in the future where we will need him there - probably very few games.

For me Aké at LB is as good as Gomez at RB. Robertson is the total package - very good in attacking and defending. But after all the years with Moreno i'd be happy with a more defensive option like Aké.

Of course its personal preference but i had enough of 'failed wingers turned into fullbacks'. That was also the reason why i wasn't impressed with Camacho a few days ago because he looks more like a winger than a defender.
 

Limiescouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
16,595
I like Joe Gomez as a RB option and i think there will be situations in the future where we will need him there - probably very few games.

For me Aké at LB is as good as Gomez at RB. Robertson is the total package - very good in attacking and defending. But after all the years with Moreno i'd be happy with a more defensive option like Aké.
The problem with that comparison is that Gomez is a spectacular defender. What we may lose in attacking quality (and I think that is sometimes over stated), is balanced by how well he can shut down that flank defensively. Ake is not on that level defensively. He is a very good footballer who has found a home in defense and is now trying to learn how to play it.

I like Ake, but I dont think he has kicked on to the the player I thought he would be during his 3rd year of regular football. I think he is probably still learning, but at this stage if we were to buy him he would be a notable drop off in quality in either of the two positions he is being touted as cover for. And even then, it doesnt address the real issue, that a kid at his stage of development isnt going to leave a good situation like Bournmouth to come and be a Phil Neville type hole filler player for 15 games a season.
 

RedForever2014

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
3,978
I agree about Mignolet (more because the Goalkeeper is almost playing a different game) but I think it’s harsh to say Moreno and Sturbridge wouldn’t look better playing in the first team. Mostly because we’ve seen that they do.

Last night Moreno was playing next to a Midfielder covering at CB, and with Curtis Jones ahead of him. That’s going to test the very best full backs.

Put him next to Van Dijk, and with Sadio Mane ahead of him, and you get a different player. He’ll still only use his right leg to stand on, and tackle like he’s doing a special move in Street Fighter II, but his flaws would be far less exposed than they were last night.
It is true that backups need to be considered in the context of how they do when in a best 11, as en masse their flaws get exposed more.

In that context Moreno can be partially excused, as he does ok against the right opposition in the best 11. His attitude still sucked at Wolves though.

Whilst the same can be said of all departments, the reality is that in the forwards there is not the required depth to compete on all fronts.

We are the only top 6 club that rarely gets beyond the early rounds of any domestic cup competition, something that is just not acceptable.

The fact that having a squad to compete on all fronts actually also makes you more likely to compete for the title and CL as primary objectives, strengthens the argument for building such a squad.

I can just about accept us consciously going into the second half of the season with only 7 defenders, even though 3 of them are injury prone, as some of our midfielders can be used there.

But if we look at the 12 players we have for the 6 midfield/attack positions, Lallana's fitness cannot be relied on, Keita is not performing, despite his goal Origi does not look like a player who can offer us any real rotation for Bobby, and Sturridge just doesn't offer enough other than in late cameos. That's a third of the midfield/forward squad, leaving us with only 8 real rotation options for 6 positions - Fab, Gini, Hendo, Milner, Shaqiri, Bobby, Mo, Mane.

I'd argue that's not enough anyway, but given that midfielders might end up in defence during the run in, now that we've weakened our defensive squad and that our centre backs have again shown themselves to be injury prone, I do not believe that we will win the title if we remain in the CL to the semi final, if the squad remains as is.

There is a very strong case for adding a quality attacking midfielder and/or forward to the squad this January, to upgrade our options AND facilitate the greater use of midfielders to cover defence.

I find it very frustrating and indicative that the club seems unable or unwilling to do this, although I hope that it may still happen.

If we can sell Origi and add a quality option, it would make a world of difference to our chances, it really would.
 

Limiescouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
16,595
There is a very strong case for adding a quality attacking midfielder and/or forward to the squad this January, to upgrade our options AND facilitate the greater use of midfielders to cover defence.

I find it very frustrating and indicative that the club seems unable or unwilling to do this, although I hope that it may still happen.
What if we know exactly who we want, but appreciate that while getting him in the summer is likely, getting him now is near impossible?
 
Last edited:

Iluvatar

Allez (x6)
Ad-free Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2015
Messages
9,408
What if we know exactly who we want, but appreciate that while getting him in the summer is likely, getting him know is near impossible?
That doesn’t suit his narrative. He is so entrenched that for him to climb out and say FSG and Edwards are doing a good job would be near impossible.
 

Fhree

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Messages
1
As a Swiss Liverpool fan I'd really love to see Manuel Akanji with the Reds. Would be an outstanding player (CB). Unfortunately just got injured but someone, Liverpool should focus on imo --> Player Profile

btw don't know if you knew that, but did you know FC Basel did only buy Mo Salah from Egypt as a replacement for Xherdan Shaqiri's departure? If Shaq wouldn't have left to Bayern Munich, Mo Salah might never have changed to Europe!
 

W00die

Well-Known Member
Ad-free Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2013
Messages
366
As a Swiss Liverpool fan I'd really love to see Manuel Akanji with the Reds. Would be an outstanding player (CB). Unfortunately just got injured but someone, Liverpool should focus on imo --> Player Profile

btw don't know if you knew that, but did you know FC Basel did only buy Mo Salah from Egypt as a replacement for Xherdan Shaqiri's departure? If Shaq wouldn't have left to Bayern Munich, Mo Salah might never have changed to Europe!
So I suppose the important question is who did they buy to replace Salah? :)
 

Iluvatar

Allez (x6)
Ad-free Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2015
Messages
9,408
As a Swiss Liverpool fan I'd really love to see Manuel Akanji with the Reds. Would be an outstanding player (CB). Unfortunately just got injured but someone, Liverpool should focus on imo --> Player Profile

btw don't know if you knew that, but did you know FC Basel did only buy Mo Salah from Egypt as a replacement for Xherdan Shaqiri's departure? If Shaq wouldn't have left to Bayern Munich, Mo Salah might never have changed to Europe!
We tried to sign Akanji before he went to Dortmund.
 

RedForever2014

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
3,978
Personally I still favour us doing something this window.

I think adding some quality to the squad this month would be a further step in the evolution of the squad, especially as several players will leave this summer and need replacing. A face or two now would ease the transition in a summer that could see both back up full backs, the back up keeper, a centre back, a couple of midfielders (Milner and Lallana), and two forwards (Sturridge and Origi) move on.

It would also take advantage of our current standing, and firm up a challenge that could yet unravel.

We are heavily reliant on VVD and Salah, and whilst most sides are reliant on a few players, the depth of quality beyond those players determines what happens if you lose them for a while, namely whether you still compete regardless or fade away.

Looking at the squad, we can probably survive without defensive reinforcement. Moreno can play 3 or 4 matches during the run in to give Andy a rest, without risking results, if he's in a strong 11. We can cover right back with other players from midfield and centre back should be ok as long as VVD remains unscathed. His absence from the CL first leg will give him two weeks off, a positive from a negative.

Central midfield is ok, albeit that if Milner and Fabinho get used in defence it will stretch the rotation options there and Gini and Hendo won't get much rotation and rest.

It is in attacking midfield and the forwards we could do with a boost.

I put Lallana and Keita in that group, as you'd never use them in a midfield two in a 4231. Keita is showing very little, Lallana cannot stay fit long enough to get game time to get match fit.

Origi shows glimpses, like his goals (good follow up instincts versus Everton and a good technical strike at Wolves), but his all round game doesn't offer what we need. He's a last half hour man in matches already won and very occasional starter.

As to Sturridge, if his workrate and physical presence was ever enough, which IMO it wasn't, he'll most likely be too scared to get himself injured in the months before his contract expires to extend himself.

Only Shaqiri is a genuine option to use alongside the front 3 in a 4231, or as one of the forward 3 in a 433. But even he blows hot and cold and doesn't seem a top class 10 or mobile enough forward.

With so many issues in that group of 5 players other than Bobby, Mo and Mane, who you'd use in the 31 of a 4231, I do think we should be adding someone.

Bring a Fekir or Werner in and we'd definitely be more equipped to manage the PL and CL challenges.

People talk about integration time, but quality players adapt quickly, or at the very least offer more from the bench whilst they settle than average and/or unmotivated players do. During the last 30 minutes of matches the 'game plan' is often deviated from and sheer quality shines through.

I know some think I'm negative, it's more frustration because I see an opportunity to win both the CL and PL this season and I really want the club to do something to increase the odds of it happening.

But in Sturridge, Origi, Lallana, Keita and even Shaqiri, I don't see enough of what we need for that to happen.
 
Last edited:

Brigadear

New Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2018
Messages
5
Gary Cahill on a six month loan?
I would defo go with this. I have to say I am worried about our CB's as apart from VVD they all seem to be made of glass and they are another injury away, I worry that if we don't address this it will cost us the title.
 

SirBillShankly

We live in a fallen world.
Joined
Jan 8, 2011
Messages
10,843
I would defo go with this. I have to say I am worried about our CB's as apart from VVD they all seem to be made of glass and they are another injury away, I worry that if we don't address this it will cost us the title.
Don't think it's necessary really. Matip was on the bench yesterday, Lovren will be fit very soon as will Gomez. Besides, Fabinho has been a fabulous stand-in.

As for who I would buy. Has to be Timo Werner.

Looks like a faster, more technical version of Kuyt. Seems a real team player aswell, I think he would fit in very nicely.
 
Last edited:

wibseyred

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2013
Messages
1,021
People talk about integration time, but quality players adapt quickly, or at the very least offer more from the bench whilst they settle than average and/or unmotivated players do. During the last 30 minutes of matches the 'game plan' is often deviated from and sheer quality shines through.
Fair point but I raise you the issues Keita is having he's now been in her 7 months and is still struggling to adapt he's offering nothing at present. To a slighted lesser extent is Fabinho who didn't really become a valued first team member till his 3rd month at the club.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.