• Hey Guest!
    Enjoy the This Is Anfield Forums but want to remove the adverts? Now you can do so by clicking here.
    Thanks for your support!

Who would you buy?

Danny Sarge

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2017
Messages
96
Zaha's quality but I'm not so sure that's true anymore. There are some really good wide players outside the top 6 - Richarlison, Pererya, Anderson and Fraser come to mind.

Fraser is very seriously underrated I feel, his delivery into the box is consistently excellent.
Totally agree that Fraser's a good player and very underrated in that matter but I think Zaha's class and in a big team (Like ours) he would shine.
 


Limiescouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
13,647
Ake, as mentioned by the poster above you, would actually be a really sound shout. Good quality in two positions, and would allow us to move on both Matip (simply injured too much to rely on) and Moreno and upgrade both positions, depth-wise, at a stroke. Rarely injured, afaik. Not sure how much he would cost, £30-40m maybe (pure speculation on my part and am in ignorance about his contract situation). We also seem to have a good relationship with Bournemouth when it comes to transfers. Could get behind a move like that.

VVD & Joe are the first-choice CB pairing now for the next 6 or 7 years, Lovren and Ake backing them up is pretty strong, although I would certainly have an eye on replacing Lovren in subsequent windows as and when the opportunity arises.
I know he played a fair bit at LB, but I think that was more a case of him being left footed and just what you do to blood a kid into a senior football (see Stevie). He certainly doesnt play the role in a way that would provide a legitimate challenge to Robbo in the role. The way he plays I think he is a more a DM/CB combo than a CB/LB combo player, and even then I dont think he has developed into quite the quality of CB I thought he would despite a couple of season of regular football now at Bournmouth.

Would it make sense though for us to have a player who could drop into any of 3 positions? Sure. Not sure it would make sense for him though given he would have to improve a ton to ever not be a distant second best in any of those roles. At this stage it would likely be more a repeat of the Zenden move...someone who looks like it makes sense on paper, but ends up being notably inferior than your other options in every role he is given leaving the fans to smack their heads whenever they see his name on the team sheet.
 

GermanRed

from doubters to believers to sky-high achievers
Joined
Jan 26, 2017
Messages
3,170
I know he played a fair bit at LB, but I think that was more a case of him being left footed and just what you do to blood a kid into a senior football (see Stevie). He certainly doesnt play the role in a way that would provide a legitimate challenge to Robbo in the role. The way he plays I think he is a more a DM/CB combo than a CB/LB combo player, and even then I dont think he has developed into quite the quality of CB I thought he would despite a couple of season of regular football now at Bournmouth.

Would it make sense though for us to have a player who could drop into any of 3 positions? Sure. Not sure it would make sense for him though given he would have to improve a ton to ever not be a distant second best in any of those roles. At this stage it would likely be more a repeat of the Zenden move...someone who looks like it makes sense on paper, but ends up being notably inferior than your other options in every role he is given leaving the fans to smack their heads whenever they see his name on the team sheet.
I like Joe Gomez as a RB option and i think there will be situations in the future where we will need him there - probably very few games.

For me Aké at LB is as good as Gomez at RB. Robertson is the total package - very good in attacking and defending. But after all the years with Moreno i'd be happy with a more defensive option like Aké.

Of course its personal preference but i had enough of 'failed wingers turned into fullbacks'. That was also the reason why i wasn't impressed with Camacho a few days ago because he looks more like a winger than a defender.
 



Limiescouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
13,647
I like Joe Gomez as a RB option and i think there will be situations in the future where we will need him there - probably very few games.

For me Aké at LB is as good as Gomez at RB. Robertson is the total package - very good in attacking and defending. But after all the years with Moreno i'd be happy with a more defensive option like Aké.
The problem with that comparison is that Gomez is a spectacular defender. What we may lose in attacking quality (and I think that is sometimes over stated), is balanced by how well he can shut down that flank defensively. Ake is not on that level defensively. He is a very good footballer who has found a home in defense and is now trying to learn how to play it.

I like Ake, but I dont think he has kicked on to the the player I thought he would be during his 3rd year of regular football. I think he is probably still learning, but at this stage if we were to buy him he would be a notable drop off in quality in either of the two positions he is being touted as cover for. And even then, it doesnt address the real issue, that a kid at his stage of development isnt going to leave a good situation like Bournmouth to come and be a Phil Neville type hole filler player for 15 games a season.
 

RedForever2014

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
3,976
I agree about Mignolet (more because the Goalkeeper is almost playing a different game) but I think it’s harsh to say Moreno and Sturbridge wouldn’t look better playing in the first team. Mostly because we’ve seen that they do.

Last night Moreno was playing next to a Midfielder covering at CB, and with Curtis Jones ahead of him. That’s going to test the very best full backs.

Put him next to Van Dijk, and with Sadio Mane ahead of him, and you get a different player. He’ll still only use his right leg to stand on, and tackle like he’s doing a special move in Street Fighter II, but his flaws would be far less exposed than they were last night.
It is true that backups need to be considered in the context of how they do when in a best 11, as en masse their flaws get exposed more.

In that context Moreno can be partially excused, as he does ok against the right opposition in the best 11. His attitude still sucked at Wolves though.

Whilst the same can be said of all departments, the reality is that in the forwards there is not the required depth to compete on all fronts.

We are the only top 6 club that rarely gets beyond the early rounds of any domestic cup competition, something that is just not acceptable.

The fact that having a squad to compete on all fronts actually also makes you more likely to compete for the title and CL as primary objectives, strengthens the argument for building such a squad.

I can just about accept us consciously going into the second half of the season with only 7 defenders, even though 3 of them are injury prone, as some of our midfielders can be used there.

But if we look at the 12 players we have for the 6 midfield/attack positions, Lallana's fitness cannot be relied on, Keita is not performing, despite his goal Origi does not look like a player who can offer us any real rotation for Bobby, and Sturridge just doesn't offer enough other than in late cameos. That's a third of the midfield/forward squad, leaving us with only 8 real rotation options for 6 positions - Fab, Gini, Hendo, Milner, Shaqiri, Bobby, Mo, Mane.

I'd argue that's not enough anyway, but given that midfielders might end up in defence during the run in, now that we've weakened our defensive squad and that our centre backs have again shown themselves to be injury prone, I do not believe that we will win the title if we remain in the CL to the semi final, if the squad remains as is.

There is a very strong case for adding a quality attacking midfielder and/or forward to the squad this January, to upgrade our options AND facilitate the greater use of midfielders to cover defence.

I find it very frustrating and indicative that the club seems unable or unwilling to do this, although I hope that it may still happen.

If we can sell Origi and add a quality option, it would make a world of difference to our chances, it really would.
 

Limiescouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
13,647
There is a very strong case for adding a quality attacking midfielder and/or forward to the squad this January, to upgrade our options AND facilitate the greater use of midfielders to cover defence.

I find it very frustrating and indicative that the club seems unable or unwilling to do this, although I hope that it may still happen.
What if we know exactly who we want, but appreciate that while getting him in the summer is likely, getting him now is near impossible?
 
Last edited:

Iluvatar

Allez (x6)
Ad-free Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2015
Messages
7,554
What if we know exactly who we want, but appreciate that while getting him in the summer is likely, getting him know is near impossible?
That doesn’t suit his narrative. He is so entrenched that for him to climb out and say FSG and Edwards are doing a good job would be near impossible.
 



Fhree

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Messages
1
As a Swiss Liverpool fan I'd really love to see Manuel Akanji with the Reds. Would be an outstanding player (CB). Unfortunately just got injured but someone, Liverpool should focus on imo --> Player Profile

btw don't know if you knew that, but did you know FC Basel did only buy Mo Salah from Egypt as a replacement for Xherdan Shaqiri's departure? If Shaq wouldn't have left to Bayern Munich, Mo Salah might never have changed to Europe!
 

W00die

Well-Known Member
Ad-free Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2013
Messages
257
As a Swiss Liverpool fan I'd really love to see Manuel Akanji with the Reds. Would be an outstanding player (CB). Unfortunately just got injured but someone, Liverpool should focus on imo --> Player Profile

btw don't know if you knew that, but did you know FC Basel did only buy Mo Salah from Egypt as a replacement for Xherdan Shaqiri's departure? If Shaq wouldn't have left to Bayern Munich, Mo Salah might never have changed to Europe!
So I suppose the important question is who did they buy to replace Salah? :)
 



Iluvatar

Allez (x6)
Ad-free Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2015
Messages
7,554
As a Swiss Liverpool fan I'd really love to see Manuel Akanji with the Reds. Would be an outstanding player (CB). Unfortunately just got injured but someone, Liverpool should focus on imo --> Player Profile

btw don't know if you knew that, but did you know FC Basel did only buy Mo Salah from Egypt as a replacement for Xherdan Shaqiri's departure? If Shaq wouldn't have left to Bayern Munich, Mo Salah might never have changed to Europe!
We tried to sign Akanji before he went to Dortmund.
 

RedForever2014

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
3,976
Personally I still favour us doing something this window.

I think adding some quality to the squad this month would be a further step in the evolution of the squad, especially as several players will leave this summer and need replacing. A face or two now would ease the transition in a summer that could see both back up full backs, the back up keeper, a centre back, a couple of midfielders (Milner and Lallana), and two forwards (Sturridge and Origi) move on.

It would also take advantage of our current standing, and firm up a challenge that could yet unravel.

We are heavily reliant on VVD and Salah, and whilst most sides are reliant on a few players, the depth of quality beyond those players determines what happens if you lose them for a while, namely whether you still compete regardless or fade away.

Looking at the squad, we can probably survive without defensive reinforcement. Moreno can play 3 or 4 matches during the run in to give Andy a rest, without risking results, if he's in a strong 11. We can cover right back with other players from midfield and centre back should be ok as long as VVD remains unscathed. His absence from the CL first leg will give him two weeks off, a positive from a negative.

Central midfield is ok, albeit that if Milner and Fabinho get used in defence it will stretch the rotation options there and Gini and Hendo won't get much rotation and rest.

It is in attacking midfield and the forwards we could do with a boost.

I put Lallana and Keita in that group, as you'd never use them in a midfield two in a 4231. Keita is showing very little, Lallana cannot stay fit long enough to get game time to get match fit.

Origi shows glimpses, like his goals (good follow up instincts versus Everton and a good technical strike at Wolves), but his all round game doesn't offer what we need. He's a last half hour man in matches already won and very occasional starter.

As to Sturridge, if his workrate and physical presence was ever enough, which IMO it wasn't, he'll most likely be too scared to get himself injured in the months before his contract expires to extend himself.

Only Shaqiri is a genuine option to use alongside the front 3 in a 4231, or as one of the forward 3 in a 433. But even he blows hot and cold and doesn't seem a top class 10 or mobile enough forward.

With so many issues in that group of 5 players other than Bobby, Mo and Mane, who you'd use in the 31 of a 4231, I do think we should be adding someone.

Bring a Fekir or Werner in and we'd definitely be more equipped to manage the PL and CL challenges.

People talk about integration time, but quality players adapt quickly, or at the very least offer more from the bench whilst they settle than average and/or unmotivated players do. During the last 30 minutes of matches the 'game plan' is often deviated from and sheer quality shines through.

I know some think I'm negative, it's more frustration because I see an opportunity to win both the CL and PL this season and I really want the club to do something to increase the odds of it happening.

But in Sturridge, Origi, Lallana, Keita and even Shaqiri, I don't see enough of what we need for that to happen.
 
Last edited:

Brigadear

New Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2018
Messages
5
Gary Cahill on a six month loan?
I would defo go with this. I have to say I am worried about our CB's as apart from VVD they all seem to be made of glass and they are another injury away, I worry that if we don't address this it will cost us the title.
 

SirBillShankly

Joe and Holly's Dad
Joined
Jan 8, 2011
Messages
10,086
I would defo go with this. I have to say I am worried about our CB's as apart from VVD they all seem to be made of glass and they are another injury away, I worry that if we don't address this it will cost us the title.
Don't think it's necessary really. Matip was on the bench yesterday, Lovren will be fit very soon as will Gomez. Besides, Fabinho has been a fabulous stand-in.

As for who I would buy. Has to be Timo Werner.

Looks like a faster, more technical version of Kuyt. Seems a real team player aswell, I think he would fit in very nicely.
 
Last edited:

wibseyred

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2013
Messages
307
People talk about integration time, but quality players adapt quickly, or at the very least offer more from the bench whilst they settle than average and/or unmotivated players do. During the last 30 minutes of matches the 'game plan' is often deviated from and sheer quality shines through.
Fair point but I raise you the issues Keita is having he's now been in her 7 months and is still struggling to adapt he's offering nothing at present. To a slighted lesser extent is Fabinho who didn't really become a valued first team member till his 3rd month at the club.
 



Mascot88

Yours for £1m. Need to make room for Dean Saunders
Admin
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
21,414
Fair point but I raise you the issues Keita is having he's now been in her 7 months and is still struggling to adapt he's offering nothing at present. To a slighted lesser extent is Fabinho who didn't really become a valued first team member till his 3rd month at the club.
This is exactly it. Why RedForever, who’s seen players come in and have to spend months learning the system, expects players to come in and contribute to the title challenge I don’t know.

Besides, if we short because Keita hasn’t settled, wouldn’t it be better to let him settle than get another body in?
 

Barnestormer

Left wing.
Joined
Jul 10, 2007
Messages
5,834
It would seem sensible to get another body in with regard to backing up the front three; its presently Shaq Sturridge and Origi, thats an intermittent 1 out of 3, which is bad. A marque signing now, to play up front, would be such a statement of intent. Im not sure the club want that pressure and are looking to ease into champions pedigree rather than kick start a media event; because such a signing would feed the journos and intensify this run in.
 

MW2833

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2018
Messages
673
This is exactly it. Why RedForever, who’s seen players come in and have to spend months learning the system, expects players to come in and contribute to the title challenge I don’t know.

Besides, if we short because Keita hasn’t settled, wouldn’t it be better to let him settle than get another body in?
Shaqiri is playing more and more matches as we play 4-2-3-1.
So if one of our front 4 gets injured?
I would rather Werner comes to replace one of the injured players, rather than Origi or Sturridge coming on or Keita playing LW out of his natural position.
Even if we revert back to a 4-3-3, the rest of our front players cannot play every game.
This summer, Sturridge and Origi will move on, harry Wilson may come into the first team and Brewster will also be promoted. AOC will hopefully also have recovered and come back stronger.

But imo we still need an attacking option this January, especially considering our low depth this season and manes relatively poor form.


Besides if we bring Werner in, it should help Keita get settled too due to their past relationship.
 

Anfield rd Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Ad-free Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
11,523
This is exactly it. Why RedForever, who’s seen players come in and have to spend months learning the system, expects players to come in and contribute to the title challenge I don’t know.

Besides, if we short because Keita hasn’t settled, wouldn’t it be better to let him settle than get another body in?
3 points.

First Keita isn't going to get settled played out of position, he needs to be put back in his natural CM position so that won't happen till we have more attacking options so he stops being shifted out to fill those gaps. Benefit for the current players.

Second a player who performs as well as Keitas spotty form, who is a natural fit for Klopps attack, will still be an improvement for this season over having to play Lallana, Origi or Sturridge none of which are in good form or good fits anyway themselves. Benefit for this season.

3rd by the new player having that settling in period this season they don't have it next season. By waiting till the summer you're delaying the inevitable. The settling in period is still going to happen. So the player could do it during next season or fire on all cylinders from match day 1 next season. Benefit for next season.
 

GermanRed

from doubters to believers to sky-high achievers
Joined
Jan 26, 2017
Messages
3,170
Werner not available this month.

Even a player of his quality would need time to adapt - but we only have 4 months until the end of the season.
 



wibseyred

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2013
Messages
307
First Keita isn't going to get settled played out of position, he needs to be put back in his natural CM position
Sorry but this played out of position stuff is getting silly now. Keita has been here 7 months and has been played in that role more times than not. Do you think he's not training to do that job come the weekend he's been thrown there.
 

Anfield rd Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Ad-free Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
11,523
Sorry but this played out of position stuff is getting silly now. Keita has been here 7 months and has been played in that role more times than not. Do you think he's not training to do that job come the weekend he's been thrown there.
He's a CM. He was being bought when we were also targeting Fekir. Fekir plays CAM/number 10 and can cover wide left. We didn't sign Fekir and we have good strong options in CM (especially with Wijnaldum being better this season than last). It's not really surprising to see Keita "filling in" for the failed acquisition of Fekir in some of the roles Fekir would have been used in. Keita is our most creative and attacking CM so it's him or the hardly ever available Lallana that's most likely to do a job for us there. Come on it's hardly a giant leap to make that conclusion is it? But to say his form has been spotty is an understatement. He's shown flashes of what he can offer the team but he's clearly struggling so far. He's pretty much been a CM of one type or other his whole career. It's at least plausible that he'd settle into the team quicker if that was the position he was playing isn't it?
 

Anfield rd Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Ad-free Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
11,523
Before Keita was bought, or arrived rather, everyone in here was told by the master of scouts in TIA that he is the player that has the talent to play anywhere in midfield, be it defensive or attacking. Now he has a fixed role, without that he won't succeed?
You missed out the word centre. Anywhere in centre midfield defensive or attacking. Big difference between that and covering for Mane on the left wing.