• Hey Guest!
    Enjoy the This Is Anfield Forums but want to remove the adverts? Now you can do so by clicking here.
    Thanks for your support!

Who would you buy?

Red Spud

Active Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2018
Messages
66
We cant say for sure if Bernardo Silva would relegate Henderson to squad player, but I'm sure he would.
Henderson is already a squad player and a very useful one at that.

He struggled playing as the holding midfielder but since Fabinho made that position his own and Hendo moved further forward he has been great. Not to mention the influence he has off the pitch.

Whatever transfers we end up making in the summer, and a creative midfielder would be very useful, I can't see Henderson going anywhere for a while.
 

William Clarke

REDSHIRT ~ I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one
Joined
Dec 28, 2017
Messages
2,246
Am I the only one who doesnt quite see why there is the fuss about De Ligt? Of all the things there was to credit Ajax about on this CL run this season, their defending was not one of them, and I didnt see anything from him in those games when it was problematic that suggested this was something happening around him.
I believe this lad, twenty years old on the 12 August, and standing 1.89m (6ft 2ins) on his bare feet, is a player for both now and the future.

Matthijs de Ligt's playing record is impressive, too.
He has played for the Netherlands U15, U16, U17, U19 and the full national side, where he has played 15 games already. Playing alongside his national partner, van Dijk, he will continue to improve and, like Virg, could become another monster in our defence. There are those who believe we don't need another central defender because we have Joe Gomez, but I think bringing de Ligt in would improve Joe's game and make the competition for places so much better for our team.
 

Mousecat

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2014
Messages
369
Henderson is already a squad player and a very useful one at that.

He struggled playing as the holding midfielder but since Fabinho made that position his own and Hendo moved further forward he has been great. Not to mention the influence he has off the pitch.

Whatever transfers we end up making in the summer, and a creative midfielder would be very useful, I can't see Henderson going anywhere for a while.
No neither can i. And im not about calling for his sale. How I see his situation going is him being gradually phased out of the first team more as the squad gets better, wanting first team football, then klopp saying he won't stand in his way.

But I could be wrong. Let's see

To honest the de ligt thing is a bit ironic given the Henderson topic.

Joe Gomez looked like potential world class with genuine standout attributes.

Do you get another world class player on board for a position that isn't often rotated?
 

Billy Biskix

TIA Youth Team
Ad-free Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
2,928
I believe this lad, twenty years old on the 12 August, and standing 1.89m (6ft 2ins) on his bare feet, is a player for both now and the future.

Matthijs de Ligt's playing record is impressive, too.
He has played for the Netherlands U15, U16, U17, U19 and the full national side, where he has played 15 games already. Playing alongside his national partner, van Dijk, he will continue to improve and, like Virg, could become another monster in our defence. There are those who believe we don't need another central defender because we have Joe Gomez, but I think bringing de Ligt in would improve Joe's game and make the competition for places so much better for our team.
I can't see us buying another CB unless one is due to be offloaded. Lovren is the most likely candidate but he needs to be persuaded to go (assuming JK wants rid) and still has 2 years left on his contract. From what I've seen I would rate Gomez above de Ligt and he was genuinely unlucky with his injury last season so I don't buy the 'injury-prone' argument when it is applied to him. We also need to factor in Hoever, maybe not for next season but certainly the season after that. He has the potential to be better than the pair of them. If we do spend a lot of money on a player this summer it is likely to be in a forward role rather than a defensive one, I'd have thought.
 

Mousecat

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2014
Messages
369
I do think he's more injury prone playing at right back. I wouldn't have a big lad like him running the touchline. I don't like it at all. He's athletic, but he's a big heavy athletic, not a whippet like the other two. I think him and Virgil has the potential to be the best partnership in Europe
 

SithBaare

From Doubters to Believers
Joined
Aug 10, 2017
Messages
2,157
Am I the only one who doesnt quite see why there is the fuss about De Ligt? Of all the things there was to credit Ajax about on this CL run this season, their defending was not one of them, and I didnt see anything from him in those games when it was problematic that suggested this was something happening around him.
It's about his level at the age of 19. He's at least the same level as those at 23 playing for top clubs.

Also, it's about getting the defense in order for the best part of the next decade and a half.
 

SithBaare

From Doubters to Believers
Joined
Aug 10, 2017
Messages
2,157
I do think he's more injury prone playing at right back. I wouldn't have a big lad like him running the touchline. I don't like it at all. He's athletic, but he's a big heavy athletic, not a whippet like the other two. I think him and Virgil has the potential to be the best partnership in Europe
Anyone that plays alongside Virgil for that matter. That partnership will be good.

Matip looked lost when paired against lovren but look at his improvement when he's playing alongside Virgil. I can think of atleast a couple of games where he's actually out performed Virgil , especially during the run in.

As of now , I reckon that klopp rates Virgil and matip as his first choice cb partnership and they have delivered the goods more often than not
 

Limiescouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
14,656
It's about his level at the age of 19. He's at least the same level as those at 23 playing for top clubs.

Also, it's about getting the defense in order for the best part of the next decade and a half.
Right, I get that he is considered a top prospect, but my point is that I don't see that level of performance from him yet. From what I see is not yet on a par with Gomez or Matip, and not even really that close. If that analysis is true, then it has to temper what the expectations of him at liverpool would be, and I dont know that is congruoous with the sort of transfer fee it would take to land him.

I think it should also be pointed out that CB prospects are among the hardest to develop to fully fledged top players.
 

William Clarke

REDSHIRT ~ I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one
Joined
Dec 28, 2017
Messages
2,246
Right, I get that he is considered a top prospect, but my point is that I don't see that level of performance from him yet. From what I see is not yet on a par with Gomez or Matip, and not even really that close. If that analysis is true, then it has to temper what the expectations of him at liverpool would be, and I dont know that is congruoous with the sort of transfer fee it would take to land him.

I think it should also be pointed out that CB prospects are among the hardest to develop to fully fledged top players.
When you say that you don't see a level of performance in de Ligt, I cast your mind back to those questioning the inclusion of Robbo. What the hell is he doing in our side, him from relegated Hull City? Well, that question has well and truly been answered. @Limiescouse , you mention Gomez and Matip being, presumably, ahead of de Ligt, and yet they just weren't cutting it until they paired up with Virgil. Matthijs de Ligt has already played with Virgil and can only get better. It must also be remembered that at 19 years he already has 15 full international caps (that's if the Dutch award them). I think if we could afford him then it's a no-brainer that we should buy him.
 

SithBaare

From Doubters to Believers
Joined
Aug 10, 2017
Messages
2,157
Right, I get that he is considered a top prospect, but my point is that I don't see that level of performance from him yet. From what I see is not yet on a par with Gomez or Matip, and not even really that close. If that analysis is true, then it has to temper what the expectations of him at liverpool would be, and I dont know that is congruoous with the sort of transfer fee it would take to land him.

I think it should also be pointed out that CB prospects are among the hardest to develop to fully fledged top players.
It's about how good he will be after a couple of seasons under virg or even pique for Barcelona. The market is inflated now and so are the prices. It is indeed speculation but a Gomez if he was signed at the age of 19 from a top 6 club and not from charlton then would have been around 30m then too.
 

Limiescouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
14,656
When you say that you don't see a level of performance in de Ligt, I cast your mind back to those questioning the inclusion of Robbo. What the hell is he doing in our side, him from relegated Hull City? Well, that question has well and truly been answered. @Limiescouse
I dont think the analogy is a good one. I dont know how many people had watched Robbo, and so most of the criticisms were based on the idea that we should be aiming higher than a player "no one has heard of" from a relegated team. They were not based on a rationale judgement of his ability. FWIW, as soon as the links were made I was fully on board. My issue with De Ligt is the 5 or 6 times I have seen him this season I do not see the player other people seem to think they are seeing.
 
Last edited:

William Clarke

REDSHIRT ~ I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one
Joined
Dec 28, 2017
Messages
2,246
I dont think the analogy is a good one. I dont know how many people had watched Robbo, and so most of the criticisms were based on the idea that we should be aiming higher than a player "no one has heard of" from a relegated team. They were not based on a rationale judgement of his ability. FWIW, as soon as the links were made I was fully on board. My issue with De Ligt is the 5 or 6 times I have seen him this season I do not see a CB on a par with those playing in the top teams, as has been suggested.
I don't think any judgement was made on his ability, it was more that he was coming from a relegated club, so inferring his ability couldn't be good enough for our club. In regards to de Ligt, we are talking of a recognised international player who is being selected on a regular basis. I would like to see him signed for our club and only the transfer fee would be an obstacle to his possible signing.
 

SithBaare

From Doubters to Believers
Joined
Aug 10, 2017
Messages
2,157
I don't think any judgement was made on his ability, it was more that he was coming from a relegated club, so inferring his ability couldn't be good enough for our club. In regards to de Ligt, we are talking of a recognised international player who is being selected on a regular basis. I would like to see him signed for our club and only the transfer fee would be an obstacle to his possible signing.
Transfer fee and his wages too. I'd say his wages demands more.
 

SithBaare

From Doubters to Believers
Joined
Aug 10, 2017
Messages
2,157
People say we've spent on our back four. Fact is we've only bought Virgil and lovren for big money , alright sakho if we are pedantic but we've more or less recovered his money ... Speaking only on the transfer fees.

Matip free
Trent youth
Robbo 8m
Virgil 75m
Lovren 30m ?
Gomez 8m ?

Look at the market now when there are people willing to pay 60-70m for a 19 year old.

Any other team with a need to revamp their entire defense would easily need to spend twice the same amount
 

William Clarke

REDSHIRT ~ I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one
Joined
Dec 28, 2017
Messages
2,246
People say we've spent on our back four. Fact is we've only bought Virgil and lovren for big money , alright sakho if we are pedantic but we've more or less recovered his money ... Speaking only on the transfer fees.

Matip free
Trent youth
Robbo 8m
Virgil 75m
Lovren 30m ?
Gomez 8m ?

Look at the market now when there are people willing to pay 60-70m for a 19 year old.

Any other team with a need to revamp their entire defense would easily need to spend twice the same amount
Yeah, as I remarked in an earlier post, it would only be the costs involved in signing de Ligt that would put Klopp off from getting him - that's if our manager is interested in getting another central defender.
 

Limiescouse

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
14,656
I don't think any judgement was made on his ability, it was more that he was coming from a relegated club, so inferring his ability couldn't be good enough for our club. In regards to de Ligt, we are talking of a recognised international player who is being selected on a regular basis.
So are you agreeing that it isn't a fitting analogy?
 

William Clarke

REDSHIRT ~ I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one
Joined
Dec 28, 2017
Messages
2,246
So are you agreeing that it isn't a fitting analogy?
Agree in that Robbo wasn't at the time a recognised international whereas de Ligt is, but the only point I was making is that the Dutchman would fit into our back line really well and only the high cost of his signature would be a stumbling block in us getting him - and of course Klopp wanting him.
 

RedForever2014

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
3,976
Matip has certainly transformed from Bambi on ice to Olympic winning ice skater in recent months.

I still worry about his injury record, but he does look more Varane than Traore right now.

That said, he's only a year left on his contract, and having done the Bosman with big signing on bonus when he left his last club to join us, maybe he's planning the same again.

We should always be looking ahead, always reducing risks to our chances of stability and success, and for me De Ligt remains viable as an upgrade on Lovren, especially given Matip's situation and Gomez's injury record.
 

William Clarke

REDSHIRT ~ I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one
Joined
Dec 28, 2017
Messages
2,246
Matip has certainly transformed from Bambi on ice to Olympic winning ice skater in recent months.

I still worry about his injury record, but he does look more Varane than Traore right now.

That said, he's only a year left on his contract, and having done the Bosman with big signing on bonus when he left his last club to join us, maybe he's planning the same again.

We should always be looking ahead, always reducing risks to our chances of stability and success, and for me De Ligt remains viable as an upgrade on Lovren, especially given Matip's situation and Gomez's injury record.
Do you think de Ligt's cost would be too exorbitant for our money chest?
 

Red over the water

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 13, 2018
Messages
2,629
I think Lovren was more like 20M and Gomez closer to 3M.

Anyway, the point is well made that even though we have spent a lot of money in one or two positions, we have spent peanuts in others, so overall the defense is still a bargain.
 

William Clarke

REDSHIRT ~ I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one
Joined
Dec 28, 2017
Messages
2,246
I think Lovren was more like 20M and Gomez closer to 3M.

Anyway, the point is well made that even though we have spent a lot of money in one or two positions, we have spent peanuts in others, so overall the defense is still a bargain.
Absolutely agree with you although there will be those who will point to the money that was spent on bringing Virgil van Dijk to the club.
 

William Clarke

REDSHIRT ~ I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one
Joined
Dec 28, 2017
Messages
2,246
Paying out of the arse for a player to replace Lovren seems barmy to me unless you're listing a broken leg as proof of being 'injury prone',fucking ridiculous.
If we are talking about Lovren, I have never made any pretence in thinking the man as a footballer is nothing but a pile of crap and not the world's greatest centre back as he believes himself to be. I would sell the bugger in a heartbeat - and at a knockdown price just to get quickly rid of the crap fecker.

p.s. Did I come over a little too strong then, do you think? :think:
 

Keegans Perm

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Messages
454
Just goes to show how strong our team actually is at the moment with the amount of bickering about who we should bring in/drop. But its all been a good read looking at everyone's point of views and its certainly going to be an exciting summer with the choices we make with who to bring in.
I just think with the Fekir ordeal last summer that an AM is definitely on the cards. Maybe Klopp was uncertain on how well Hendo would play when being pushed further forward but he may have done enough to change Klopps original plans with how well he performed.
Like others, I certainly wouldnt grumble if we spent big on De Ligt, but I'd be extremely surprised if that happened, even though we have had injury problems at the back. God forbid if anything happened to Van Dijk, id feel much more at ease knowing De Ligt was there.
As I say though, im not sure who we will go for, but I guess thats why Klopp earns the big bucks. He'll know exactly what he wants and the majority of Liverpool fans will trust his judgement.
Exciting times ahead for this beast of a club.
 

Scott Jones

Blunt
Ad-free Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2016
Messages
16,238
If we are talking about Lovren, I have never made any pretence in thinking the man as a footballer is nothing but a pile of crap and not the world's greatest centre back as he believes himself to be. I would sell the bugger in a heartbeat - and at a knockdown price just to get quickly rid of the crap fecker.
I'm talking about the over the top narrative of Gomez being written off as injury prone,does my fucking head in,he's quality and buying the Dutch kid would be writing Joe Gomez off which i think is stupid.
 

Scott Jones

Blunt
Ad-free Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2016
Messages
16,238
If we are talking about Lovren, I have never made any pretence in thinking the man as a footballer is nothing but a pile of crap and not the world's greatest centre back as he believes himself to be. I would sell the bugger in a heartbeat - and at a knockdown price just to get quickly rid of the crap fecker.

p.s. Did I come over a little too strong then, do you think? :think:
He's not Moreno though is he,some would have you believe Lovren is as bad as Moreno,that's complete bollocks.
 

William Clarke

REDSHIRT ~ I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one
Joined
Dec 28, 2017
Messages
2,246
I'm talking about the over the top narrative of Gomez being written off as injury prone,does my fucking head in,he's quality and buying the Dutch kid would be writing Joe Gomez off which i think is stupid.
No, Joe Gomez is too good to be written off. If de Ligt was brought into the club I can see nothing but good coming from it. Competition for places is the name of the game for bringing a team on and I would say Joe would relish proving he was as good if not better than the young Dutchman. Again, I say a big no to Gomez being written off.